Workplace-based assessment in radiology-where to now?

被引:20
作者
Augustine, K. [1 ]
McCoubrie, P. [1 ]
Wilkinson, J. R. [2 ]
McKnight, L. [3 ]
机构
[1] Southmead Gen Hosp, N Bristol NHS Trust, Dept Radiol, Bristol BS10 5NB, Avon, England
[2] St Bartholomews Hosp, Dept Cardiol, London, England
[3] Morriston Hosp, Dept Radiol, Swansea, W Glam, Wales
关键词
ASSESSMENT INSTRUMENT; MEDICAL-EDUCATION; GENERAL-PRACTICE; PEER ASSESSMENT; PERFORMANCE; COMPETENCE; RELIABILITY; REPRODUCIBILITY; PATIENT; TOOL;
D O I
10.1016/j.crad.2009.12.004
中图分类号
R8 [特种医学]; R445 [影像诊断学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100207 ; 1009 ;
摘要
Assessment of doctors is in a state of flux. Traditional methods of assessment have been critically examined and found inherently limited. The wholesale shift towards outcome-orientated education in the last 10 years has led to the relatively rapid development of a radically different method of assessment. This method focuses on assessing what doctors do in everyday practice rather than written or practical simulations. Known collectively as "workplace-based assessment" tools, these have been embraced in North America, whereas they have been more cautiously adopted in the UK. However, many of these assessment tools have not been rigorously studied and, moreover, few have been specifically developed for assessing radiologists. However, they are likely to be incorporated into radiology training in the near future. This paper critically analyses both the underpinning assumptions behind this method and the evidence behind existing tools, and looks at the work that is required to develop, adopt or adapt such tools for use in radiology. (c) 2010 The Royal College of Radiologists. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:325 / 332
页数:8
相关论文
共 47 条
[1]   Commentary on eight CT lessons that we learned the hard way: an analysis of current patterns of radiological error and discrepancy with particular emphasis on CT [J].
Adam, E. Jane .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2009, 64 (05) :500-501
[2]   Use of SPRAT for peer review of paediatricians in training [J].
Archer, JC ;
Norcini, J ;
Davies, HA .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2005, 330 (7502) :1251-1253
[3]   Mini-PAT (Peer assessment tool): A valid component of a national assessment programme in the UK? [J].
Archer, Julian ;
Norcini, John ;
Southgate, Lesley ;
Heard, Shelley ;
Davies, Helena .
ADVANCES IN HEALTH SCIENCES EDUCATION, 2008, 13 (02) :181-192
[4]  
Brown N., 2006, Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, V12, P81, DOI DOI 10.1192/APT.12.2.81
[5]   Work-based assessment for trainees - more than just a few new tools [J].
Burkill, G. J. C. .
CLINICAL RADIOLOGY, 2008, 63 (01) :12-14
[6]   Assessing the professional performance of UK doctors: an evaluation of the utility of the General Medical Council patient and colleague questionnaires [J].
Campbell, J. L. ;
Richards, S. H. ;
Dickens, A. ;
Greco, M. ;
Narayanan, A. ;
Brearley, S. .
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE, 2008, 17 (03) :187-193
[7]   Sheffield Assessment Instrument for Letters (SAIL): performance assessment using outpatient letters [J].
Crossley, JGM ;
Howe, A ;
Newble, D ;
Jolly, B ;
Davies, HA .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2001, 35 (12) :1115-1124
[8]   How to assess your specialist registrar [J].
Davies, H ;
Howells, R .
ARCHIVES OF DISEASE IN CHILDHOOD, 2004, 89 (12) :1089-1093
[9]   Specialty-specific multi-source feedback: assuring validity, informing training [J].
Davies, Helena ;
Archer, Julian ;
Bateman, Adrian ;
Dewar, Sandra ;
Crossley, Jim ;
Grant, Janet ;
Southgate, Lesley .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2008, 42 (10) :1014-1020
[10]   Initial evaluation of the first year of the Foundation Assessment Programme [J].
Davies, Helena ;
Archer, Julian ;
Southgate, Lesley ;
Norcini, John .
MEDICAL EDUCATION, 2009, 43 (01) :74-81