The Durom Large Diameter Head acetabular component EARLY RESULTS WITH A LARGE-DIAMETER METAL-ON-METAL BEARING

被引:53
作者
Berton, C. [1 ]
Girard, J. [1 ]
Krantz, N. [1 ]
Migaud, H. [1 ]
机构
[1] CHRU, Hop Salengro, Serv Orthopedie C, F-59037 Lille, France
来源
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME | 2010年 / 92B卷 / 02期
关键词
TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY; THAN; 50; YEARS; FEMORAL HEADS; ILIOPSOAS IMPINGEMENT; BONE INGROWTH; LONG-TERM; FOLLOW-UP; RESURFACING ARTHROPLASTY; SURFACE REPLACEMENT; DISLOCATION;
D O I
10.1302/0301-620X.92B2.22653
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
100224 [整形外科学];
摘要
Implantation of a large-diameter femoral head prosthesis with a metal-on-metal bearing surface reduces the risk of dislocation, increases the range of movement, minimises the risk of impingement and, in theory, results in little wear. Between February 2004 and March 2007 we implanted 100 consecutive total hip replacements with a metal-on-metal bearing and a large femoral head into 92 patients. There were 51 men and 41 women with a mean age of 50 years (18 to 70) at the time of surgery. Outcome was assessed using the Western Ontario McMaster University osteoarthritis index and the Harris hip score as well as the Devane activity score. These all improved significantly (p < 0.0001). At the last follow-up there were no cases of dislocation, no impingement, a good range of movement and no osteolysis, but seven revisions, two for infection and five for aseptic loosening. The probability of groin pain increased if the other acetabular component inclination exceeded 50 (p = 0.0007). At 4.8 years of follow-up, the projected survival of the Durom acetabular component, with revision for any reason, was 92.4% (SD 2.8) (95% confidence interval 89.6 to 95.2). The design of the component made it difficult both to orientate and seat, which when combined with a poor porous coating, produced unpredictable fixation and a low survival at five years.
引用
收藏
页码:202 / 208
页数:7
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]
Amstutz H. C., 1996, CLIN ORTHOP S, V329, P11
[2]
[Anonymous], 1979, Clin Orthop Relat Res
[3]
THE MCKEE-FARRAR HIP-ARTHROPLASTY - A LONG-TERM STUDY [J].
AUGUST, AC ;
ALDAM, CH ;
PYNSENT, PB .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1986, 68 (04) :520-527
[4]
The effect of femoral component head size on posterior dislocation of the artificial hip joint [J].
Bartz, RL ;
Noble, PC ;
Kadakia, NR ;
Tullos, HS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2000, 82A (09) :1300-1307
[5]
Jumbo femoral head for the treatment of recurrent dislocation following total hip replacement [J].
Beaule, PE ;
Schmalzried, TP ;
Udomkiat, P ;
Amstutz, HC .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2002, 84A (02) :256-263
[6]
BELLAMY N, 1988, J RHEUMATOL, V15, P1833
[7]
Effect of femoral head diameter and operative approach on risk of dislocation after primary total hip arthroplasty [J].
Berry, DJ ;
Von Knoch, M ;
Schleck, CD ;
Harmsen, WS .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-AMERICAN VOLUME, 2005, 87A (11) :2456-2463
[8]
Sonography of the iliopsoas tendon and injection of the iliopsoas Bursa for diagnosis and management of the painful snapping hip [J].
Blankenbaker, DG ;
De Smet, AA ;
Keene, JS .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 2006, 35 (08) :565-571
[9]
Bobyn J.D., 1980, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, V149, P291
[10]
BOBYN JD, 1980, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P263