Refixation frequency and memory mechanisms in visual search

被引:164
作者
Gilchrist, ID [1 ]
Harvey, M [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Bristol, Dept Expt Psychol, Bristol BS8 1TN, Avon, England
基金
英国工程与自然科学研究理事会;
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0960-9822(00)00729-6
中图分类号
Q5 [生物化学]; Q7 [分子生物学];
学科分类号
071010 ; 081704 ;
摘要
Visual search - looking for a target object in the presence of a number of distracter items - is an everyday activity for humans (for example, finding the car in a busy car park) and animals (for example, foraging for food). Our understanding of visual search has been enriched by an interdisciplinary effort using a wide range of research techniques including behavioural studies in humans [1], single-cell electrophysiology [2], transcranial magnetic stimulation [3], event-related potentials [4] and studies of patients with focal brain injury [5]. A central question is what kind of information controls the search process. Visual search is typically accompanied by a series of eye movements, and investigating the nature and location of fixations helps to identify the kind of information that might control the search process. It has already been demonstrated that objects are fixated if they are visually similar to the target [6]. Also, if an item has been fixated, it is less likely to be returned to on the subsequent saccade. This automatic process is referred to as inhibition of return (IOR [7,8]). Here, we investigated the role of memory for which items had been fixated previously. We found that, during search, subjects often refixated items that had been previously fixated. Although there were fewer return saccades than would be expected by chance, the number of refixations indicated limited functional memory, indeed the memory effects that were present may primarily be a result of IOR. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:1209 / 1212
页数:4
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Temporal aspects of visual search studied by transcranial magnetic stimulation [J].
Ashbridge, E ;
Walsh, V ;
Cowey, A .
NEUROPSYCHOLOGIA, 1997, 35 (08) :1121-1131
[2]   Saccade target selection during visual search [J].
Findlay, JM .
VISION RESEARCH, 1997, 37 (05) :617-631
[3]   PREATTENTIVE PROCESSES GUIDE VISUAL-SEARCH - EVIDENCE FROM PATIENTS WITH UNILATERAL VISUAL NEGLECT [J].
GRABOWECKY, M ;
ROBERTSON, LC ;
TREISMAN, A .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1993, 5 (03) :288-302
[4]  
Henderson J. M., 1992, EYE MOVEMENTS VISUAL, P261
[5]   Visual search has no memory [J].
Horowitz, TS ;
Wolfe, JM .
NATURE, 1998, 394 (6693) :575-577
[6]   Inhibition of return [J].
Klein, RM .
TRENDS IN COGNITIVE SCIENCES, 2000, 4 (04) :138-147
[7]   Inhibition of return is a foraging facilitator in visual search [J].
Klein, RM ;
MacInnes, WJ .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 1999, 10 (04) :346-352
[8]   The guidance of eye movements during active visual search [J].
Motter, BC ;
Belky, EJ .
VISION RESEARCH, 1998, 38 (12) :1805-1815
[9]   DETECTING CONJUNCTIONS OF COLOR AND FORM - REASSESSING THE SERIAL SEARCH HYPOTHESIS [J].
PASHLER, H .
PERCEPTION & PSYCHOPHYSICS, 1987, 41 (03) :191-201
[10]   Visual marking: Prioritizing selection for new objects by top-down attentional inhibition of old objects [J].
Watson, DG ;
Humphreys, GW .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1997, 104 (01) :90-122