The estimation of long term impacts of China's key priority forestry programs on rural household incomes

被引:39
作者
Liu, Can [1 ,3 ]
Mullan, Katrina [2 ]
Liu, Hao [3 ]
Zhu, Wenqing [4 ]
Rong, Qingjiao [1 ]
机构
[1] Northwest Agr & Forestry Univ, Econ & Management Coll, Shaanxi 712100, Peoples R China
[2] Univ Montana, Dept Econ, Missoula, MT 59812 USA
[3] China Natl Forestry Econ & Dev Res Ctr, Beijing 100714, Peoples R China
[4] China Agr Univ, Beijing 100083, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Priority forestry programs; Rural households' income; Rural development; Forest economics; Ecological restoration; China; REHABILITATION; CONSERVATION;
D O I
10.1016/j.jfe.2014.08.001
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
We use a large unique household panel dataset spanning 16 years to estimate the impacts of three Key Priority Forestry Programs (the KPFPs) in China on household incomes. The programs are the most significant of China's forest policies namely the Sloping Land Conversion Program (the SLCP), the Natural Forest Protection Program (the NFPP), and the Desertification Combating Program around Beijing and Tianjin (the DCBT). A fixed effect model with clustered standard errors is used to identify programs' impacts based on variation in participation across households and time. In addition to estimating the total impacts of these programs, individually and in combination, we disaggregate the effects by income source, stage of policy implementation, and duration of participation. Overall, the impacts of the KPFPs on rural households' income vary with time of enrollment and policy stage. We observe that the KPFPs in their initial stages of implementation, and for the early years of household participation, had negative, or at best neutral impacts on household incomes, in particular incomes from land. However, the later stages of the SLCP and the DCBT have tended to raise land-based incomes, and the NFPP has ceased to have a negative effect. This is likely to be in part the result of adjustments made by rural households over time in response to changes in the programs, as well as in market and environmental conditions. (C) 2014 Department of Forest Economics, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umea. Published by Elsevier GmbH. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 285
页数:19
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1985, LONGITUDINAL ANAL LA
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2009, STAT WORLDS FOR 2009
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2001, Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data
[4]  
[Anonymous], CRS REP C
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1964, TRANSFORMATION TRADI
[6]   USING THE LONGITUDINAL STRUCTURE OF EARNINGS TO ESTIMATE THE EFFECT OF TRAINING-PROGRAMS [J].
ASHENFELTER, O ;
CARD, D .
REVIEW OF ECONOMICS AND STATISTICS, 1985, 67 (04) :648-660
[7]  
China National Statistics Bureau, 2012, YB CHIN STAT
[8]  
China National Statistics Bureau, 2011, YB CHIN STAT
[9]  
GREEN B R, 1983, Journal of Cellular Biochemistry Supplement, P322
[10]   Making the most out of programme evaluations and social experiments: Accounting for heterogeneity in programme impacts [J].
Heckman, JJ ;
Smith, J ;
Clements, N .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1997, 64 (04) :487-535