Weighing the pros and cons for composite outcomes in clinical trials

被引:27
作者
Freemantle, Nick [1 ]
Calvert, Melanie [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Birmingham, Dept Primary Care & Gen Practice, Birmingham B15 2TT, W Midlands, England
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.10.024
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
引用
收藏
页码:658 / 659
页数:2
相关论文
共 5 条
[1]   Some issues with composite endpoints in clinical trials [J].
Chi, GYH .
FUNDAMENTAL & CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY, 2005, 19 (06) :609-619
[2]  
FDA Draft Guidance for Industry, 2006, PAT REP OUTC MEAS US
[3]   Methodologic discussions for using and interpreting composite endpoints are limited, but still identify major concerns [J].
Ferreira-Gonzalez, Ignacio ;
Permanyer-Miralda, Gaieta ;
Busse, Jason W. ;
Bryant, Dianne M. ;
Montori, Victor M. ;
Alonso-Coello, Pablo ;
Walter, Stephen D. ;
Guyatt, Gordon H. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2007, 60 (07) :651-657
[4]   Composite outcomes in randomized trials - Greater precision but with greater uncertainty? [J].
Freemantle, N ;
Calvert, M ;
Wood, J ;
Eastaugh, J ;
Griffin, C .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (19) :2554-2559
[5]  
1999, STAT MED, P1905