Analytical methods to support continuous improvements at Scania

被引:39
作者
Colledani, M. [1 ]
Ekvall, M. [2 ]
Lundholm, T. [3 ]
Moriggi, P. [1 ]
Polato, A. [1 ]
Tolio, T. [1 ]
机构
[1] Politecn Milan, Dept Mech Engn, Mfg & Prod Syst Div, I-20156 Milan, Italy
[2] Scania CV AB, SE-15187 Sodertalje, Sweden
[3] Kungliga Tekniska Hogskolan Design & Management M, SE-10044 Stockholm, Sweden
关键词
decomposition methods; performance evaluation; productivity improvements; buffer allocation; repair crew allocation; UNRELIABLE MACHINES; PERFORMANCE EVALUATION; DECOMPOSITION METHOD; SYSTEMS; SIMULATION; DESIGN; LINES;
D O I
10.1080/00207540802538039
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
Considerable effort is usually devoted by companies to ensure the competitiveness of their manufacturing systems. This makes continuous improvement a central topic in production management activities. Less attention is given to the methods that drive improvement and to the way actions are defined and selected. In the literature, analytical models and simulation are the most widely used tools for manufacturing systems' performance evaluation and improvement. In practice, simple approaches, mainly based on experience, seems to be the best compromise to face this problem. In a collaboration project between Politecnico di Milano ( Milano, Italy), Kungliga Tekniska hogskolan ( Stockholm, Sweden) and Scania CV AB (Sodertalje, Sweden) within the European Network of Excellence VRL-KCiP we proposed a new methodology, based on analytical methods, to support the company in manufacturing system productivity improvement through re-configuration. The application of this approach to the Scania six-cylinder engine-block machining line enabled a remarkable increment in throughput by selecting analytically the most suitable improvement actions.
引用
收藏
页码:1913 / 1945
页数:33
相关论文
共 39 条
  • [1] General motors increases its production throughput
    Alden, JM
    Burns, LD
    Costy, T
    Hutton, RD
    Jackson, CA
    Kim, DS
    Kohls, KA
    Owen, JH
    Turnquist, MA
    Vander Veen, DJ
    [J]. INTERFACES, 2006, 36 (01) : 6 - 25
  • [2] Pilot production and manufacturing start-up: the case of Volvo S80
    Almgren, H
    [J]. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 2000, 38 (17) : 4577 - 4588
  • [3] Bley H, 1997, CIRP ANNALS 1997 MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, VOLUME 46/1/1997, V46, P361
  • [4] Hewlett-Packard uses operations research to improve the design of a printer production line
    Burman, M
    Gershwin, SB
    Suyematsu, C
    [J]. INTERFACES, 1998, 28 (01) : 24 - 36
  • [5] Buzacott J.A., 1967, International Journal of Production Research, V5, P183, DOI [10.1080/00207546708929751, DOI 10.1080/00207546708929751]
  • [6] Improvability of assembly systems I: Problem formulation and performance evaluation
    Chiang, SY
    Kuo, CT
    Lim, JT
    Meerkov, SM
    [J]. MATHEMATICAL PROBLEMS IN ENGINEERING, 2000, 6 (04) : 321 - 357
  • [7] Performance evaluation of linear and non-linear multi-product multi-stage lines with unreliable machines and finite homogeneous buffers
    Colledani, M.
    Gandola, F.
    Matta, A.
    Tolio, T.
    [J]. IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2008, 40 (06) : 612 - 626
  • [8] A decomposition method to support the configuration/reconfiguration of production systems
    Colledani, M
    Tolio, T
    [J]. CIRP ANNALS-MANUFACTURING TECHNOLOGY, 2005, 54 (01) : 441 - 444
  • [9] Performance evaluation of production lines with finite buffer capacity producing two different products
    Colledani, M
    Matta, A
    Tolio, T
    [J]. OR SPECTRUM, 2005, 27 (2-3) : 243 - 263
  • [10] Colledani M., 2004, 37th CIRP International Seminar on Manufacturing Systems, P231