Flexible automated parameterization of hydrologic models using fuzzy logic - art. no. 1009

被引:17
作者
Samanta, S
Mackay, DS
机构
[1] Univ Wisconsin, Dept Forest Ecol & Management, Madison, WI 53715 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Inst Environm Studies, Madison, WI 53706 USA
关键词
automated parameter estimation; hydrologic models; fuzzy logic; Monte Carlo sampling; FOREST ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES; IMPROVED CALIBRATION; GLOBAL OPTIMIZATION; CATCHMENT MODELS; WATERSHED SCALE; UNCERTAINTY; SENSITIVITY; MULTIPLE; EUTROPHICATION; CLIMATE;
D O I
10.1029/2002WR001349
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
Recent developments in model calibration suggest that information obtained from calibration is inherently uncertain in nature. Therefore identification of optimum parameter values is often highly nonspecific. A calibration framework using fuzzy logic is presented to deal with such uncertain information. An application of this technique to calibrate the streamflow of a hydrologic submodel embedded within an ecosystem simulation model demonstrates that objective estimates of parameter values and the range of model output associated with a failure to identify a unique solution can be obtained with suitable choices of objective functions. An iterative refinement in parameter estimates through a process of elimination was possible by incorporating multiple objective functions in calibration, thereby reducing the range of parameter values that capture the streamflow response. It is shown that objective function tradeoffs can lead to suboptimal solutions using the process of elimination without an automated procedure for reevaluation. Owing to its computational simplicity and flexibility this framework could be extended into a nonmonotonic system for automated parameter estimation.
引用
收藏
页数:13
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]   FOREST ECOSYSTEM PROCESSES AT THE WATERSHED SCALE - INCORPORATING HILLSLOPE HYDROLOGY [J].
BAND, LE ;
PATTERSON, P ;
NEMANI, R ;
RUNNING, SW .
AGRICULTURAL AND FOREST METEOROLOGY, 1993, 63 (1-2) :93-126
[2]   Sensitivity of a high-elevation Rocky Mountain watershed to altered climate and CO2 [J].
Baron, JS ;
Hartman, MD ;
Band, LE ;
Lammers, RB .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (01) :89-99
[3]   Multi-criteria validation of a precipitation-runoff model [J].
Beldring, S .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2002, 257 (1-4) :189-211
[4]   PROPHECY, REALITY AND UNCERTAINTY IN DISTRIBUTED HYDROLOGICAL MODELING [J].
BEVEN, K .
ADVANCES IN WATER RESOURCES, 1993, 16 (01) :41-51
[5]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[6]   CHANGING IDEAS IN HYDROLOGY - THE CASE OF PHYSICALLY-BASED MODELS [J].
BEVEN, K .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 1989, 105 (1-2) :157-172
[7]  
Beven K.J., 1986, SCALING PROBLEMS HYD, P107, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-94-009-4678-1_6
[8]  
Beven K.J., 1979, Hydrol. Sci. Bull., V24, P43, DOI DOI 10.1080/02626667909491834
[9]  
Binley A.M., 1991, Computer Modeling in the Environmental Sciences, P75
[10]   Toward improved calibration of hydrologic models: Combining the strengths of manual and automatic methods [J].
Boyle, DP ;
Gupta, HV ;
Sorooshian, S .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2000, 36 (12) :3663-3674