Predicting methadone maintenance treatment outcomes using the addiction severity index and the MMPI-2 content scales (negative treatment indicators and cynism scales)

被引:12
作者
Craig, RJ
Olson, RE
机构
[1] VA Chicago Hlth Care Syst, Drug Abuse Treatment Ctr, Chicago, IL 60612 USA
[2] Oakland Univ, Rochester, MI 48063 USA
关键词
methadone; methadone maintenance; addiction severity index; MMPI-2; treatment outcome;
D O I
10.1081/ADA-200037548
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
We studied the ability of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Content Scales (Negative Treatment Indicators [TRT] and Cynicism [CYN]) and the domain scales of the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) in predicting outcome from a methadone maintenance program. Participants were 108 African American males treated in a VA health care outpatient methadone maintenance treatment program and followed for up to I year after admission. Dependent variables were 1) length of stay and the percentage of 2) missed medication days, 3) toxicology urine samples free from illicit drugs, 4) full-time employment, 5) attendance at scheduled counseling sessions, and 6) counselor ratings of patient progress. A stepwise linear regression equation indicated that low drug severity scores on the ASI and low scores on percentage of missed medication predicted patients who were clean I year later; low scores on the psychological domain of the ASI predicted attendance at counseling sessions; a discriminant function analysis (consisting of percent of missed medication, percentage of clean urines, and ratings of patient progress) successfully predicted patient status (i.e., dropouts vs. "active patients") with 85% accuracy. Although the TRT and CYN were related to some ASI domains, they were not associated with any outcome variable. Results suggest that some ASI scores serve as important indicators of patient progress in methadone maintenance treatment.
引用
收藏
页码:823 / 839
页数:17
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
Aaronson AL, 1996, J CLIN PSYCHOL, V52, P311, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4679(199605)52:3<311::AID-JCLP8>3.0.CO
[2]  
2-U
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Drug abuse treatment: A national study of effectiveness
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1993, State methadone treatment guidelines
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2001, HDB DIAGNOSTIC STRUC
[6]  
[Anonymous], MINNESOTA MULTIPHASI
[7]  
[Anonymous], COMP EFFECTIVENESS D
[8]  
Ball J.C., 1991, EFFECTIVENESS METHAD
[9]  
BENPORATH YS, 1993, MMPI 2 CONTENT COMPO
[10]   Methadone maintenance - Does dose determine differences in outcome? [J].
Blaney, T ;
Craig, RJ .
JOURNAL OF SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT, 1999, 16 (03) :221-228