Trends and transitions in the institutional environment for public and private science

被引:25
作者
Owen-Smith, J [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI 48104 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院; 美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
institutional change; organizational environment; university; partly of license; research communication;
D O I
10.1007/s10734-004-2916-4
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
The last quarter-century bore witness to a sea change in academic involvement with commerce. Widespread university-based efforts to identify, manage, and market intellectual property (IP) have accompanied broad shifts in the relationship between academic and proprietary approaches to the dissemination and use of science and engineering research. Such transformations are indicators of institutional changes at work in the environment faced by universities. This paper draws upon a fifteen-year panel (1981-1995) of university-level data for 87 research-intensive US campuses in order to document trends and transitions in relationships among multiple indicators of academic and commercial engagement. The institutional environment for public and private science is volatile, shifting in fits and starts from a situation conducive to organizational learning through high volume patenting to a more challenging arrangement that links indiscriminate pursuit of IP with declines in both the volume and impact of academic science. The pattern and timing of these transitions may support an enduring system of stratification that offers increasing returns to first-movers while limiting the opportunities available to universities that are later entrants to the commercial realm. Unpacking the systematic effects of university research commercialization requires focused attention on the sources and trajectories of profound institutional change.
引用
收藏
页码:91 / 117
页数:27
相关论文
共 57 条
[1]   Putting patents in context: Exploring knowledge transfer from MIT [J].
Agrawal, A ;
Henderson, R .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2002, 48 (01) :44-60
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1998, CREATING ENTREPRENEU
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Working Paper
[4]   COMPLEMENTARITY AND EXTERNAL LINKAGES - THE STRATEGIES OF THE LARGE FIRMS IN BIOTECHNOLOGY [J].
ARORA, A ;
GAMBARDELLA, A .
JOURNAL OF INDUSTRIAL ECONOMICS, 1990, 38 (04) :361-379
[5]   Testing for complementarities in reduced-form regressions: A note [J].
Arora, A .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1996, 50 (01) :51-55
[6]  
*ASS U TECHN MAN, 2000, LIC SURV
[7]   Data withholding in academic medicine: characteristics of faculty denied access to research results and biomaterials [J].
Campbell, EG ;
Weissman, JS ;
Causino, N ;
Blumenthal, D .
RESEARCH POLICY, 2000, 29 (02) :303-312
[8]   Politics and institutionalism: Explaining durability and change [J].
Clemens, ES ;
Cook, JM .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF SOCIOLOGY, 1999, 25 :441-466
[9]  
DASGUPTA P, 1994, RES POLICY, V23, P487
[10]  
DASGUPTA P, 1987, ARROW ASCENT MODERN, P659