Characterisation of molecular events following cisplatin treatment of two curable ovarian cancer models:: contrasting role for p53 induction and apoptosis in vivo

被引:15
作者
Clarke, PA [1 ]
Pestell, KE [1 ]
Di Stefano, F [1 ]
Workman, P [1 ]
Walton, MI [1 ]
机构
[1] Inst Canc Res, Haddow Labs, Canc Res UK, Ctr Canc Therapeut, Sutton SM2 5NG, Surrey, England
关键词
chemotherapy; cisplatin; microarray; ovarian cancer; p53; apoptosis;
D O I
10.1038/sj.bjc.6602167
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
The detailed molecular basis and determinants of in vivo tumour sensitivity to conventional anticancer agents remain unclear. We examined the cellular and molecular consequences of cisplatin treatment using two ovarian tumour xenograft models that had not been previously adapted to culture in vitro. Both xenografts were curable with clinically relevant multiple doses of cisplatin. Following a single dose of cisplatin (6 mg kg(-1) i.p.) growth delays of 25 and 75 days were obtained for pxn100 and pxn65, respectively. This difference in response was not due to differences in DNA damage. Pxn100 tumours had a functional p53 response and a wild-type p53 sequence, whereas pxn65 harboured a mutant p53 and lacked a functional p53 response. Microarray analysis revealed the induction of p53-regulated genes and regulators of checkpoint control and apoptosis in pxn100 tumours following cisplatin-treatment. By contrast, there was no p53-dependent response and only limited changes in gene expression were detected in the pxn65 tumours. TUNEL analysis demonstrated high levels of apoptosis in the pxn100 tumours following cisplatin treatment, but there was no detectable apoptosis in the pxn65 tumours. Our observations show that a marked in vivo response to cisplatin can occur via p53-dependent apoptosis or independently of p53 status in human ovarian xenografts.
引用
收藏
页码:1614 / 1623
页数:10
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   Chemotherapy for ovarian cancer - a consensus statement on standard practice [J].
Adams, M ;
Calvert, AH ;
Carmichael, J ;
Clark, PI ;
Coleman, RE ;
Earl, HM ;
Gallagher, CJ ;
Ganesan, TS ;
Gore, ME ;
Graham, JD ;
Harper, PG ;
Jayson, GC ;
Kaye, SB ;
Ledermann, JA ;
Osborne, RJ ;
Perren, TJ ;
Poole, CJ ;
Radford, JA ;
Rustin, GJS ;
Slevin, ML ;
Smyth, JF ;
Thomas, H ;
Wilkinson, PM .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1998, 78 (11) :1404-1406
[2]  
Beale PJ, 2000, BRIT J CANCER, V82, P436
[3]  
Brown JM, 1999, CANCER RES, V59, P1391
[4]   INCREASED ACCUMULATION OF P53 PROTEIN IN CISPLATIN-RESISTANT OVARIAN CELL-LINES [J].
BROWN, R ;
CLUGSTON, C ;
BURNS, P ;
EDLIN, A ;
VASEY, P ;
VOJTESEK, B ;
KAYE, SB .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1993, 55 (04) :678-684
[5]   FURTHER CHARACTERIZATION OF THE IN-SITU TERMINAL DEOXYNUCLEOTIDYL TRANSFERASE (TDT) ASSAY FOR THE FLOW CYTOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF APOPTOSIS IN DRUG-RESISTANT AND DRUG-SENSITIVE LEUKEMIC-CELLS [J].
CHAPMAN, RS ;
CHRESTA, CM ;
HERBERG, AA ;
BEERE, HM ;
HEER, S ;
WHETTON, AD ;
HICKMAN, JA ;
DIVE, C .
CYTOMETRY, 1995, 20 (03) :245-256
[6]  
CHU G, 1994, J BIOL CHEM, V269, P787
[7]   GENOMIC SEQUENCING [J].
CHURCH, GM ;
GILBERT, W .
PROCEEDINGS OF THE NATIONAL ACADEMY OF SCIENCES OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES, 1984, 81 (07) :1991-1995
[8]  
Clarke PA, 1999, METH MOL B, V118, P1
[9]  
DEFREUDIS P, 1997, BRIT J CANCER, V76, P474
[10]   RESISTANCE TO CISPLATIN AND ANALOGS - MECHANISMS AND POTENTIAL CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS [J].
DEGRAEFF, A ;
SLEBOS, RJC ;
RODENHUIS, S .
CANCER CHEMOTHERAPY AND PHARMACOLOGY, 1988, 22 (04) :325-332