Adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer significantly improves overall survival: the missing link

被引:144
作者
Van de Steene, J [1 ]
Soete, G [1 ]
Storme, G [1 ]
机构
[1] Free Univ Brussels, Acad Hosp, Oncol Ctr AZ VUB, Dept Radiotherapy, Jette Brussels, Belgium
关键词
adjuvant radiotherapy; breast cancer; overall survival; prognostic factors; meta-analysis; review;
D O I
10.1016/S0167-8140(00)00204-8
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Background and purpose: The influence of surgical adjuvant radiotherapy on overall survival of patients with operable breast cancer is still a controversial subject. The negative result of the EBCTCG meta-analysis (Early breast cancer trialists', collaborative group. Effects of radiotherapy and surgery in early breast cancer. An overview of the randomised trials, N. Engl, J. Med. 1995;333:1444-1455) of clinical randomized trials on adjuvant radiotherapy in breast cancer is in strong contrast with the Danish 82B, 82C and British Columbia trials (Overgaard M, Hanse PS, Overgaar J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk premenopausal women with breast cancer who receive adjuvant chemotherapy. Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group 82b Trial. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997:337:949-955; Overgaard M, Jensen MB, Overgaard J, et al. Postoperative radiotherapy in high-risk postmenopausal breast-cancer patients given adjuvant tamoxifen: Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group DBCG 82c randomized trial. Lancet 1999:353:1641-1648; Ragaz J, Jackson S, Le N, et al. Adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy in node-positive premenopausal women with breast cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 1997;337:956-962) showing an impressive survival benefit. This paper tries to fill in the gap between the conflicting results. Materials and methods: The 36 trials of the EBCTCG (Early breast cancer trialists', collaborative group, 1995) were prospectively screened for a number of objective parameters that are usually not analyzed in review papers. The odds of death data (and its variance) were borrowed from the original meta-analysis (Early breast cancer trialists', collaborative group, 1995) to check whether the objective features were significant predictors for overall survival benefit. Results: A significant survival benefit for the radiotherapy arm was found for recent trials (2P < 0.05), large trials (2P < 0.03), trials that used standard fractionation (2P < 0.02), and trials with a favourable crude survival (2P < 0.03). For these four parameters clear parameter effect relations were found. In recent and large trials the odds reduction was 12.4% (2P = 0.004). Conclusions: Surgical adjuvant radiotherapy significantly improves overall survival of breast cancer patients provided that current techniques are used and treatment is given with standard fractionation. For the best subgroups we observed an odds of death reduction of more than 20%. The results of this study stress the importance of reducing cardiovascular and other late toxicity in adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:263 / 272
页数:10
相关论文
共 50 条
[1]  
ABE O, 1992, LANCET, V339, P71
[2]  
ABE O, 1995, NEW ENGL J MED, V333, P1444
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1988, NEW ENGL J MED, V319, P1681
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Lancet, V339, P1
[5]  
[Anonymous], DIS BREAST
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1990, TREATM EARL BREAST C
[7]   ADEQUATE LOCOREGIONAL TREATMENT FOR EARLY BREAST-CANCER MAY PREVENT SECONDARY DISSEMINATION [J].
ARRIAGADA, R ;
RUTQVIST, LE ;
MATTSSON, A ;
KRAMAR, A ;
ROTSTEIN, S .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1995, 13 (12) :2869-2878
[8]   ORGANIZATION OF CLINICAL TRIAL ON NATIONAL SCALE - MANAGEMENT OF EARLY CANCER OF BREAST [J].
BAUM, M ;
MAGAREY, CJ ;
EDWARDS, MH .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1972, 4 (5838) :476-&
[9]   RADIOBIOLOGICAL CONSIDERATIONS IN THE DESIGN OF CLINICAL-TRIALS [J].
BENTZEN, SM .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1994, 32 (01) :1-11
[10]   Towards evidence based radiation oncology: improving the design, analysis, and reporting of clinical outcome studies in radiotherapy [J].
Bentzen, SM .
RADIOTHERAPY AND ONCOLOGY, 1998, 46 (01) :5-18