Complications of obstetric epidural analgesia and anaesthesia: A prospective analysis of 10 995 cases

被引:137
作者
Paech, MJ [1 ]
Godkin, R [1 ]
Webster, S [1 ]
机构
[1] King Edward Mem Hosp Women, Dept Anaesthesia, Perth, WA 6008, Australia
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0959-289X(98)80021-6
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
Although epidural anaesthesia and analgesia are widely used in obstetrics, there are no large contemporary prospective series detailing associated complications. Prospective data was collected on all obstetric epidural blocks performed for labour and delivery in a single institution between July 1989 and August 1994. A data entry sheet was compiled and entered onto a computer database. Confidence intervals for proportions were calculated using standard methods. Information from 10995 epidural blocks was analysed. Epidural analgesia in labour was the primary indication in 7648, and anaesthesia for caesarean section in 3311. Minor complications included failed or abandoned insertion (incidence 0.5%), reinsertion of the epidural catheter (5%), and inadequate anaesthesia (1.7%) or analgesia (0.9%). Three percent were associated with venous puncture and 0.6% with accidental dural puncture. Maternal mortality was zero. Unexpectedly high blocks occurred on eight occasions (0.07%), two requiring intubation and ventilation. Three women (0.06%) experienced mild respiratory depression after postoperative epidural opioid. There was no major local anaesthetic toxicity or neurological deficit. The incidence of potentially life-threatening morbidity was thus 0.02%, although in both cases outcome was good. The only persisting complication was neurological, an apparent epidural catheter-induced traumatic mononeuropathy.
引用
收藏
页码:5 / 11
页数:7
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]   DIFFICULTY IN THE REMOVAL OF AN EPIDURAL CATHETER [J].
BALLANCE, JHW .
ANAESTHESIA, 1981, 36 (01) :71-72
[2]   WITHDRAWAL FORCES DURING REMOVAL OF LUMBAR EXTRADURAL CATHETERS [J].
BOEY, SK ;
CARRIE, LES .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1994, 73 (06) :833-835
[3]   PERIDURAL BLOCK - ANALYSIS OF 3,637 CASES AND A REVIEW [J].
BONICA, JJ ;
BACKUP, PH ;
ANDERSON, CE ;
HADFIELD, D ;
CREPPS, WF ;
MONK, BF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1957, 18 (05) :723-784
[4]   EPIDURAL ABSCESS AFTER OBSTETRIC EPIDURAL ANALGESIA [J].
BORUM, SE ;
MCLESKEY, CH ;
WILLIAMSON, JB ;
HARRIS, FS ;
KNIGHT, AB .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1995, 82 (06) :1523-1526
[5]   REGIONAL ANESTHESIA AND LOCAL ANESTHETIC-INDUCED SYSTEMIC TOXICITY - SEIZURE FREQUENCY AND ACCOMPANYING CARDIOVASCULAR CHANGES [J].
BROWN, DL ;
RANSOM, DM ;
HALL, JA ;
LEICHT, CH ;
SCHROEDER, DR ;
OFFORD, KP .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1995, 81 (02) :321-328
[6]   A 3-YEAR SURVEY OF AN OBSTETRIC EPIDURAL SERVICE WITH TOP-UP DOSES ADMINISTERED BY MIDWIVES [J].
BROWNRIDGE, P .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1982, 10 (04) :298-308
[7]   A COMPARISON OF OBSTETRIC AND NONOBSTETRIC ANESTHESIA MALPRACTICE CLAIMS [J].
CHADWICK, HS ;
POSNER, K ;
CAPLAN, RA ;
WARD, RJ ;
CHENEY, FW .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1991, 74 (02) :242-249
[8]  
Collier C B, 1996, Int J Obstet Anesth, V5, P19, DOI 10.1016/S0959-289X(96)80070-7
[9]   ACCIDENTAL SUBDURAL BLOCK - 4 MORE CASES AND A RADIOGRAPHIC REVIEW [J].
COLLIER, CB .
ANAESTHESIA AND INTENSIVE CARE, 1992, 20 (02) :215-232
[10]   SOME MATERNAL COMPLICATIONS OF EPIDURAL ANALGESIA FOR LABOR [J].
CRAWFORD, JS .
ANAESTHESIA, 1985, 40 (12) :1219-1225