Residual feed intake and body composition in young growing cattle

被引:347
作者
Basarab, JA
Price, MA
Aalhus, JL
Okine, EK
Snelling, WM
Lyle, KL
机构
[1] Alberta Dept Agr, Western Forage Beef Grp, Lacombe Res Ctr, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada
[2] BeefBooster Cattle Alberta Ltd, Calgary, AB T2E 7C8, Canada
关键词
cattle; feed efficiency; residual feed intake; remote sensing; GrowSafe System; ENERGY-UTILIZATION; GENETIC-VARIATION; SPECIALIZED SIRE; EFFICIENCY; HEREFORD; STEERS; ANGUS; PERFORMANCE; BEHAVIOR; TRAITS;
D O I
10.4141/A02-065
中图分类号
S8 [畜牧、 动物医学、狩猎、蚕、蜂];
学科分类号
0905 ;
摘要
Crossbred steers (n = 176), 7-8 mo of age and from the five BeefBooster strains (M1, M2, M3, M4 and TX), were used to determine the relationships between residual feed intake (RFI) and growth rate, body composition and heat production (HP), and to quantify differences in RFI independent of differences in body composition. Animals with different RFI levels were also characterized for growth, carcass and body compositional traits. Steers from each genetic strain were selected at random and serially slaughtered on 5 pre-selected days of the finishing period. Steers grew at 1.52 (SD = 0.22) kg d(-1) and had dry matter intake (DMI) of 8.5 (SD = 1.0) kg d(-1) during the last 71 to 183 d before slaughter. Metabolic mid-point weight, average daily gain (ADG), gain in empty body fat and gain in empty body water accounted for 67.9, 8.6, 3.9 and 1.1%, respectively, of the variation in actual feed intake. Similarly, metabolic mid-point weight (68.5%), ADG (8.2%), gain in ultrasound backfat thickness (1.8%), gain in ultrasound marbling score (1.1%) and year (1.3%) accounted for 80.9% of the variation in actual feed intake. Residual feed intake adjusted for differences in estimated composition of gain (estimated gain in empty body fat and water; RFII) ranged from -2.06 kg d(-1) to +1.61 kg d(-1) (SD = 0.60 kg d-1). Residual feed intake adjusted for live animal measures of body composition (gain in ultrasound backfat thickness and marbling score; RFIIII) ranged from -2.11 kg d(-1) to +1.88 kg d(-1) (SD = 0.62 kg d(-1)). Low RFIIII animals (efficient) had 6.0% lower metabolizable energy intake (MEI), retained 93% less energy and had 4.5% lower HP than medium RFIIII animals (P < 0.01). Low RFIII animals also had 10.2% lower MEI, retained 12.0% less energy and produced 9.3% less heat than high RFIIII animals (P < 0.01). Liver (P <0.01), small and large intestine (P = 0.09) and stomach and intestine (P < 0.01) weights were less in low and medium RFIIII, steers compared to high RFIIII steers. There was a trend for low RFIIII steers to have less dissectible carcass fat (P = 0.08), intermuscular fat (P = 0.06), body cavity fat in the butt and loin (P = 0.01), faster accretion rate of empty body water (P = 0.04) and a slower accretion rate of empty body fat (P < 0.01) than medium and high RFIIII, steers. A portion of the greater MEI by high RFIIII steer was accounted for by differences in the chemical composition of gain. However, a greater proportion was due to a disproportionate increase in the energy required for maintenance and heat increment of feeding in high RFIIII steers. An attempt should be made to adjust RFI for changes in the chemical composition of gain, possibly by the inclusion of ultrasound backfat thickness and marbling score into the equation for determining RFI.
引用
收藏
页码:189 / 204
页数:16
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1996, NUTR REQ BEEF CATTL
[2]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1992, Canada Gazette, Part, VII, P3821
[4]  
Archer J.A., 1998, Proc. 6th World Congr. Gen. Applied to Livest. Prod, V25, P81
[5]  
Archer JA, 1997, J ANIM SCI, V75, P2024
[6]  
Arthur P. F., 2001, Proceedings of the Fourteenth Conference of the Association for the Advancement of Animal Breeding and Genetics, Queenstown, New Zealand, 30 July-2 August 2001, P135
[7]  
Arthur PF, 2001, J ANIM SCI, V79, P2805
[8]   Genetic and phenotypic relationships among different measures of growth and feed efficiency in young Charolais bulls [J].
Arthur, PF ;
Renand, G ;
Krauss, D .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 2001, 68 (2-3) :131-139
[9]  
Basarab J.A., 2002, Net feed intake in young growing cattle, P13
[10]   PHENOTYPIC AND GENETIC-VARIATION IN BODY-WEIGHT, FOOD-INTAKE AND ENERGY-UTILIZATION IN HEREFORD CATTLE .2. EFFECTS OF AGE AND LENGTH OF PERFORMANCE-TEST [J].
BISHOP, SC .
LIVESTOCK PRODUCTION SCIENCE, 1992, 30 (1-2) :19-31