Integrating ranch forage production, cattle performance, and economics in ranch management systems for southern Florida

被引:16
作者
Arthington, J. D. [1 ]
Roka, F. M.
Mullahey, J. J.
Coleman, S. W.
Muchovej, R. M.
Lollis, L. O.
Hitchcock, D.
机构
[1] Univ Florida, IFAS, Range Cattle Res & Educ Ctr, Ona, FL 33865 USA
[2] Univ Florida, IFAS, SW Florida Res & Educ Ctr, Immokalee, FL 34142 USA
[3] Univ Florida, IFAS, W Florida Res & Educ Ctr, Milton, FL 32583 USA
[4] ARS, USDA, Subtrop Agr Res Stn, Brooksville, FL 34601 USA
[5] MacArthur Agroecol Res Ctr, Lake Placid, FL 33852 USA
[6] Univ Florida, Dept Stat, Gainesville, FL 32611 USA
关键词
forage; grazing; beef cattle; stocking density;
D O I
10.2111/05-074R1.1
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
The presence of grazing cattle near open waterways has created environmental concerns related to the potential for water contamination. In Florida the removal of cattle from grazing landscapes or decreasing stocking density is being investigated as one option to improve the quality of surface water runoff draining into Lake Okeechobee, Florida. The objective of this study was to determine the effects of stocking rate on cow-calf performance, forage availability and quality, and ranch economic performance. Experimental pastures were established on a southern Florida cow-calf operation with stocking rates of 0.58, 1.01, and 1.35 ha . cow(-1) on summer pastures and 0.93, 1.62, and 2.16 ha . cow(-1) on winter pastures, corresponding to high, medium, and low rates, respectively. The study was conducted over 4 consecutive production years. Cow body condition scores (BCS), pregnancy rate, and calf average daily gain were used as measures of animal performance. Forage utilization was estimated by measuring the difference between forage yield inside and outside grazing exclusion cages and forage quality by crude protein and in vitro organic matter digestibility. Forage yield, utilization, and quality were not significantly affected by stocking rate. Although statistically not significant (P = 0.17), cattle in the high stocking rate experienced a numerically greater loss of BCS following the winter grazing period, but stocking rate did not affect pregnancy rate or calf gains. Production (kg weaned calves . ha(-1)) was increased (P < 0.01) for a high stocking rate compared with medium and low stocking rates. Overall ranch profitability will decrease as stocking rates decline. Ranch revenues decrease one-for-one as stocking rates decrease. At the same time, unit cow costs increase at an increasing rate as fewer brood cows are left to support the ranch's fixed cost structure.
引用
收藏
页码:12 / 18
页数:7
相关论文
共 16 条
[1]  
*BUR LAB STAT, 2006, CONS PRIC IND CALC
[2]   Soil phosphorus, cattle stocking rates, and water quality in subtropical pastures in Florida, USA [J].
Capece, John C. ;
Campbell, Kenneth L. ;
Bohlen, Patrick J. ;
Graetz, Donald A. ;
Portier, Kenneth M. .
RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2007, 60 (01) :19-30
[3]  
Coleman SW, 2001, J ANIM SCI, V79, P1697
[4]   ALUMINUM BLOCK DIGESTER FOR PLANT AND SOIL ANALYSIS [J].
GALLAHER, RN ;
WELDON, CO ;
FUTRAL, JG .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1975, 39 (04) :803-806
[5]  
HAMBLETON LG, 1977, J ASSOC OFF ANA CHEM, V60, P845
[6]  
Hodgson J., 1982, Nutritional limits to animal production from pastures., P153
[7]  
MCGRANN JM, 1995, SPA1 TEX AGR EXT SER
[8]   Effects of cattle stocking rates on nematode communities in south Florida [J].
McSorley, Robert ;
Tanner, George W. .
RANGELAND ECOLOGY & MANAGEMENT, 2007, 60 (01) :31-35
[9]   RECOVERY OF RESIDUAL ORGANIC-MATTER FROM INVITRO DIGESTION OF FORAGES [J].
MOORE, JE ;
MOTT, GO .
JOURNAL OF DAIRY SCIENCE, 1974, 57 (10) :1258-1256
[10]  
Muchovej RM, 2000, SOIL CROP SCI SOC FL, V59, P82