Government spending, growth and poverty in rural India

被引:204
作者
Fan, SG
Hazell, P
Thorat, S
机构
[1] Int Food Policy Res Inst, Environm & Prod Technol Div, Washington, DC 20036 USA
[2] Jawaharlal Nehru Univ, New Delhi 110067, India
关键词
public policy; government expenditure; rural poverty; productivity growth; India;
D O I
10.1111/0002-9092.00101
中图分类号
F3 [农业经济];
学科分类号
0202 ; 020205 ; 1203 ;
摘要
Using state-level data far 1970-93, a simultaneous equation model was developed to estimate the direct and indirect effects of different types of government expenditure on rural poverty and productivity growth in India. The results show that in order to reduce rural poverty, the Indian government should give highest priority to additional investments in rural roads and agricultural research. These types of investment not only have much larger poverty impacts per rupee spent than any other government investment, but also generate higher productivity growth. Apart from government spending on education, which has the third largest marginal impact on rural poverty and productivity growth, other investments (including irrigation, soil and water conservation, health, and rural and community development) have only modest impacts on growth and poverty per additional rupee spent.
引用
收藏
页码:1038 / 1051
页数:14
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]  
Ahluwalia MS., 1985, AGR CHANGE RURAL POV
[2]  
Alston JM, 1998, EPTD Disc. Pap. 35
[3]  
Bell C., 1994, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, V56, P111, DOI 10.1111/j.1468-0084.1994.mp56002001.x
[4]  
Binswanger H.P., 1989, 163 WORLD BANK
[5]  
DATT G, 1997, 26 FCND INT FOOD POL
[6]  
DAVIDSON R, 1993, ESTIMATING INFERENCE
[7]  
FAN S, 1999, LINKAGES GOVT SPENDI
[8]  
GAIHA R, 1989, CAMBRIDGE J ECON, V13, P333
[9]  
GHOSE AK, 1989, CAMBRIDGE J ECON, V13, P307
[10]  
Greene, 2003, ECONOMETRIC ANAL, P1241