Retention of "safe" blood donors

被引:83
作者
Thomson, RA
Bethel, J
Lo, AY
Ownby, HE
Nass, CC
Williams, AE
机构
[1] Westat Corp, Rockville, MD 20850 USA
[2] Amer Red Cross, Blood Serv, Detroit, MI USA
[3] Amer Red Cross, Blood Serv, Baltimore, MD USA
[4] Amer Red Cross, Jerome H Holland Lab, Blood Serv, Rockville, MD USA
关键词
D O I
10.1046/j.1537-2995.1998.38498257374.x
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: There are obvious advantages to increasing donor retention, However, for reasons of blood safety, certain donors may, in fact, be more desirable to retain than others. "Safe" donors are defined as those who provided a blood donation that was negative on all laboratory screening tests and who subsequently reported no; behavioral risks in response to an anonymous survey. This study identifies the most important factors affecting the intention of "safe" donors to provide another donation. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: An anonymous survey asking about donation history, sexual history, injecting drug use, and recent donation experience was mailed to 50,162 randomly selected allogeneic donors (including directed donors) who gave blood from April through July or from October through December 1993 at one of the five United States blood centers participating in the Retrovirus Epidemiology Donor Study. Before mailing, questionnaires were coded to designate donors with nonreactive laboratory screening tests at their most recent donation. RESULTS: A total of 34,726 donors (69%) responded, with substantially higher response among repeat donors. According to reported intentions only, the vast majority of "safe" donors indicated a high likelihood of donating again within the next 12 months. Only 3.4 percent reported a low likelihood of donating again. A comparison of those likely to return and those unlikely to return reveals Significant differences in demographics and in ratings of the donation experience. A higher proportion of those unlikely to return were first-time donors, minority-group donors, and donors with less education. The highest projected loss among "safe" donors was seen for those who gave a fair to poor assessment of their treatment by blood center staff or of their physical well-being during or after donating. CONCLUSION: These data suggest that efforts to improve donors' perceptions of their donation experience, as well as attention to the physical effects of blood donation, may aid in the retention of both repeat and first-time donors.
引用
收藏
页码:359 / 367
页数:9
相关论文
共 17 条
[1]  
AGUILAR SM, 1993, AIDS KNOWLEDGE ATTIT
[2]   ROLE-IDENTITY AND REASONED ACTION IN THE PREDICTION OF REPEATED BEHAVIOR [J].
CHARNG, HW ;
PILIAVIN, JA ;
CALLERO, PL .
SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY QUARTERLY, 1988, 51 (04) :303-317
[3]   EXPOSURE OF PATIENTS TO HUMAN IMMUNODEFICIENCY VIRUS THROUGH THE TRANSFUSION OF BLOOD COMPONENTS THAT TEST ANTIBODY-NEGATIVE [J].
CUMMING, PD ;
WALLACE, EL ;
SCHORR, JB ;
DODD, RY .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1989, 321 (14) :941-946
[4]  
EFRON B, 1993, INTRO BOOTSTRAP, P140
[5]  
Ibrahim N A, 1993, Health Care Manage Rev, V18, P67
[6]   CONTINUITY IN SOCIAL-POLICY BEHAVIORS - THE CASE OF VOLUNTARY BLOOD DONORSHIP [J].
LIGHTMAN, ES .
JOURNAL OF SOCIAL POLICY, 1981, 10 (JAN) :53-79
[7]  
MCCULLOUGH J, 1993, JAMA-J AM MED ASSOC, V29, P2239
[8]  
MILLER HG, 1990, AIDS 2ND DECADE, P289
[9]  
MILLER RG, 1974, BIOMETRIKA, V61, P1
[10]  
MOHADJER L, 1986, P AM STAT ASS, P258