Brief proofs of Arrovian impossibility theorems

被引:20
作者
Cato, Susumu [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Tokyo, Inst Social Sci, Bunkyo Ku, Tokyo 1130033, Japan
关键词
SOCIAL CHOICE THEORY; GIBBARD-SATTERTHWAITE THEOREM; PARETO PRINCIPLE; ARROWS THEOREM; WELFARE ECONOMICS; COLLECTIVE CHOICE; AGGREGATION; RATIONALITY; PREFERENCES; NEUTRALITY;
D O I
10.1007/s00355-010-0440-2
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Since Kenneth Arrow showed the general possibility theorem, a number of social choice theorists have provided alternative proofs of it. In a recent article, Geanakoplos (Econ Theory 26:211-215, 2005) has constructed a new proof of the theorem. The present article provides alternative proofs of various Arrovian impossibility results from the 1960s to the 1970s by utilizing Geanakoplos's method. We prove semi-order impossibility theorems, the quasi-transitive veto theorem, the quasi-transitive dictatorship theorem, the triple acyclic veto theorem, and the impossibility theorem without the Pareto principle.
引用
收藏
页码:267 / 284
页数:18
相关论文
共 46 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1970, Social choice and individual values
[2]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Welfare economics and social choice theory
[3]  
[Anonymous], SOCIAL CHOICE UNPUB
[4]  
Arrow K. J., 1963, Social Choice and Individual Values, V2nd
[5]   A DIFFICULTY IN THE CONCEPT OF SOCIAL WELFARE [J].
Arrow, Kenneth J. .
JOURNAL OF POLITICAL ECONOMY, 1950, 58 (04) :328-346
[6]  
BANKS JS, 1995, SOC CHOICE WELFARE, V12, P293
[7]   PIVOTAL VOTERS - A NEW PROOF OF ARROW THEOREM [J].
BARBERA, S .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 1980, 6 (01) :13-16
[8]   The Gibbard-Satterthwaite theorem:: a simple proof [J].
Benoît, JP .
ECONOMICS LETTERS, 2000, 69 (03) :319-322
[9]   SOCIAL CHOICE AND PARTIES [J].
BINMORE, KG .
REVIEW OF ECONOMIC STUDIES, 1976, 43 (03) :459-464
[10]   SOCIAL CHOICE WITH INTERPERSONAL UTILITY COMPARISONS - A DIAGRAMMATIC INTRODUCTION [J].
BLACKORBY, C ;
DONALDSON, D ;
WEYMARK, JA .
INTERNATIONAL ECONOMIC REVIEW, 1984, 25 (02) :327-356