Effect of fall irrigation level in 'Mauritius' and 'Floridian' lychee on soil and plant water status, flowering intensity, and yield

被引:43
作者
Stern, RA
Meron, M
Naor, A
Wallach, R
Bravdo, B
Gazit, S
机构
[1] Galilee Technol Ctr, MIGAL, IL-12100 Rosh Pina, Israel
[2] Golan Res Inst, IL-12900 Kazrin, Israel
[3] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Agr, Sigrham Ctr Soil & Water, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
[4] Hebrew Univ Jerusalem, Fac Agr, Kennedy Leigh Ctr Hort Res, IL-76100 Rehovot, Israel
关键词
leaf water potential; stem water potential; Litchi chinensis; water stress;
D O I
10.21273/JASHS.123.1.150
中图分类号
S6 [园艺];
学科分类号
0902 ;
摘要
The effect of fall irrigation level in 'Mauritius' and 'Floridian' lychee (Litchi chinensis Sonn.) on soil and plant water status, flowering intensity, and yield the following year was studied in a field during 2 consecutive years. At the end of the second vegetative flush after harvest (1 Oct. 1994 and 10 Oct. 1995), four irrigation treatments were initiated: 0.5, 0.25, 0.125, and 0 Class A pan evaporation coefficients designated 100%, 50%, 25%, and 0%. The three lower irrigation levels effectively stopped shoot growth, suggesting the 50% treatment to be the threshold for shoot growth cessation in both years. For both years, flowering intensity and yield in the 100% treatment were lower than those following the other three treatments. Soil and plant water-stress indicators responded to the water-stress irrigation treatments. However soil water potential values were highly variable relative to plant water potentials. Stem water potential differed more markedly between treatments than leaf water potential. Midday stem mater potential appeared to be the best water-stress indicator for irrigation control. Midday stem water potential in both years was correlated with midday vapor-pressure deficit, suggesting that the threshold for irrigation control should take into account evaporative demand.
引用
收藏
页码:150 / 155
页数:6
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
ASSAF R, 1982, HORTSCIENCE, V17, P59
[2]  
Batten D. J., 1986, Acta Horticulturae, P79
[3]   FLORAL INDUCTION IN TROPICAL FRUIT-TREES - EFFECTS OF TEMPERATURE AND WATER-SUPPLY [J].
CHAIKIATTIYOS, S ;
MENZEL, CM ;
RASMUSSEN, TS .
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1994, 69 (03) :397-415
[4]   POLLEN PARENT EFFECT ON THE SELECTIVE ABSCISSION OF MAURITIUS AND FLORIDIAN LYCHEE FRUITLETS [J].
DEGANI, C ;
STERN, RA ;
ELBATSRI, R ;
GAZIT, S .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE, 1995, 120 (03) :523-526
[5]  
ERF JA, 1987, J AM SOC HORTIC SCI, V112, P617
[6]  
Forshey C. G., 1989, Horticultural Reviews, V11, P229, DOI 10.1002/9781118060841.ch7
[7]  
FREEMAN BM, 1976, AM J ENOL VITICULT, V27, P36
[8]  
GALANSAUCO V, 1989, 83 FAO
[9]   TESTING WATER POTENTIAL IN PEACH-TREES AS AN INDICATOR OF WATER-STRESS [J].
GARNIER, E ;
BERGER, A .
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1985, 60 (01) :47-56
[10]   EFFECTS OF SEASONAL CHANGES IN SHOOT GROWTH ON AMOUNT OF UNSUBERIZED ROOT ON APPLE AND PLUM TREES [J].
HEAD, GC .
JOURNAL OF HORTICULTURAL SCIENCE & BIOTECHNOLOGY, 1967, 42 (02) :169-&