Common aroma-active components of propolis from 23 regions of China

被引:95
作者
Yang, Chao [1 ]
Luo, Liping [2 ]
Zhang, Haijing [1 ]
Yang, Xu [1 ]
Lv, Yu [1 ]
Song, Huanlu [1 ]
机构
[1] Beijing Technol & Business Univ, Coll Chem & Environm Engn, Beijing 100048, Peoples R China
[2] Nanchang Univ, Sch Life Sci & Food Engn, Nanchang 330031, Peoples R China
关键词
propolis; aroma-active component; dynamic headspace sampling (DHS); gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry (GC-O-MS); odour activity value (OAV); sensory evaluation score; principal component analysis (PCA); PARMIGIANO REGGIANO; MASS SPECTROMETRY; OLFACTOMETRY; HEADSPACE; ODORANTS; PROFILE; FOODS; HAM;
D O I
10.1002/jsfa.3969
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
BACKGROUND: The study of propolis odorants by gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry has rarely been put into practice until now. This study aimed to investigate the common odorants of 23 samples of Chinese propolis and analyse the relationship between the principal components and the regions where the samples had been obtained. RESULTS: By using dynamic headspace sampling, gas chromatography-olfactometry-mass spectrometry and two internal standards, the principal aroma-active components of 23 propolis samples were analysed qualitatively and quantitatively. The common aroma-active components were compared with each other by principal component analysis from concentration, odour activity value (OAV) and sensory evaluation score. The components with high OAVs were acetic acid, 2-phenylethyl acetate, and naphthalene, in decreasing order, which approximated the sensory evaluation scores. On the discrete-point map the first three principal components seemed to be grouped into three patterns, while four samples were outliers. CONCLUSION: The concentrations of aroma-active components were closely related to the regions from a discrete-point map by the first three principal components. It was confirmed that components with high concentrations did not always play important roles in odour contribution, for odour level was linked with their threshold. OAVs could reflect the level of odour exactly according to the approximate result from the comparison between OAVs and sensory evaluation scores. (C) 2010 Society of Chemical Industry
引用
收藏
页码:1268 / 1282
页数:15
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   FAST CHROMATOGRAPHIC STUDY OF PROPOLIS CRUDES [J].
ACKERMANN, T .
FOOD CHEMISTRY, 1991, 42 (02) :135-138
[2]   COMPARISON OF THE ANTI-HERPES SIMPLEX VIRUS ACTIVITIES OF PROPOLIS AND 3-METHYL-BUT-2-ENYL CAFFEATE [J].
AMOROS, M ;
LURTON, E ;
BOUSTIE, J ;
GIRRE, L ;
SAUVAGER, F ;
CORMIER, M .
JOURNAL OF NATURAL PRODUCTS, 1994, 57 (05) :644-647
[3]   Studies on functional foods in Japan - State of the art [J].
Arai, S .
BIOSCIENCE BIOTECHNOLOGY AND BIOCHEMISTRY, 1996, 60 (01) :9-15
[4]  
Belitz H.D., 2004, FOOD CHEM, V3rd, P342, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-662-07279-0
[5]   Gas chromatography-olfactometry (GC-O) and proton transfer reaction-mass spectrometry (PTR-MS) analysis of the flavor profile of Grana Padano, Parmigiano Reggiano, and Grana Trentino cheeses [J].
Boscaini, E ;
Van Ruth, S ;
Biasioli, G ;
Gasperi, F ;
Märk, TD .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2003, 51 (07) :1782-1790
[6]   Review of the biological properties and toxicity of bee propolis (propolis) [J].
Burdock, GA .
FOOD AND CHEMICAL TOXICOLOGY, 1998, 36 (04) :347-363
[7]  
CADWALLADER KR, 1998, P 9 INT FLAV C G CHA, P271
[8]   Characterization of the most odor-active compounds of Iberian ham headspace [J].
Carrapiso, AI ;
Ventanas, J ;
García, C .
JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY, 2002, 50 (07) :1996-2000
[9]   PROPOLIS - REVIEW [J].
GHISALBERTI, EL .
BEE WORLD, 1979, 60 (02) :59-84
[10]   Evaluation of the key odorants of foods by dilution experiments, aroma models and omission [J].
Grosch, W .
CHEMICAL SENSES, 2001, 26 (05) :533-545