Media coverage of managed care: Is there a negative bias?

被引:50
作者
Brodie, M [1 ]
Brady, LA
Altman, DE
机构
[1] Henry J Kaiser Family Fdn, Menlo Park, CA USA
[2] Princeton Survey Res Associates, Princeton, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1377/hlthaff.17.1.9
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
We conducted content analysis of media coverage (both print and broadcast) of managed care over the period 1 January 1990 to 30 June 1997, examining in detail more than 2,100 randomly selected stories. Coverage changed noticeably over the seven and a half-year period, with early years focused on managed care as a business story, and later years focused more on patient care and concerns about backlash. Coverage differed substantially depending on media source. The large majority of all media coverage of managed care was neutral in tone; However, the tone of coverage has become more critical over time and differs dramatically by source of media. The most visible media sources-television and newspaper special series-conveyed negative stories in more than half of their coverage and most often used anecdotes in telling their stories.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 25
页数:17
相关论文
共 9 条
  • [1] COTTON P, 1996, MED HLTH 0122, P1
  • [2] *HJ KAIS FAM FDN, 1997, MED FACTS MED MAN CA
  • [3] *HJ KAIS FAM FDN, 1997, MED PROGR MAN CAR
  • [4] *KAIS FAM FDN HARV, 1997, NAT SURV AM VIEW MAN
  • [5] *KAIS FAM FDN TIM, 1993, HLTH CAR REF MED MON
  • [6] *KPMG PEAT MARW, 1997, HLTH BEN 1997
  • [7] Rogers Everett M, 1988, Communication Yearbook, DOI [10.1080/23808985.1988.11678708, DOI 10.1080/23808985.1988.11678708]
  • [8] SERAFINI M, 1996, NATL J 0302, P504
  • [9] KAISER HARVARD PRINC