Effects of stop-signal probability in the stop-signal paradigm: The N2/P3 complex further validated

被引:193
作者
Ramautar, JR
Kok, A
Ridderinkhof, KR
机构
[1] Univ Amsterdam, Dept Psychol, NL-1018 WB Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] Leiden Univ, Dept Psychol, Leiden, Netherlands
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.bandc.2004.07.002
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
The aim of this study was to examine the effects of frequency of occurrence of stop signals in the stop-signal paradigm. Presenting stop signals less frequently resulted in faster reaction times to the go stimulus and a lower probability of inhibition. Also, go stimuli elicited larger and somewhat earlier P3 responses when stop signals occurred less frequently. Since the amplitude effect was more pronounced on trials when go signals were followed by fast than slow reactions, it probably reflected a stronger set to produce fast responses. N2 and P3 components to stop signals were observed to be larger and of longer latency when stop signals occurred less frequently. The amplitude enhancement of these N2 and P3 components were more pronounced for unsuccessful than for successful stop-signal trials. Moreover, the successfully inhibited stop trials elicited a frontocentral P3 whereas unsuccessfully inhibited stop trials elicited a more posterior P3 that resembled the classical P3b. P3 amplitude in the unsuccessfully inhibited condition also differed between waveforms synchronized with the stop signal and waveforms synchronized with response onset whereas N2 amplitude did not. Taken together these findings suggest that N2 reflected a greater significance of failed inhibitions after low probability stop signals while P3 reflected continued processing of the erroneous response after response execution. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:234 / 252
页数:19
相关论文
共 60 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1986, PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY SYS
[2]   Stop-signal inhibition disrupted by damage to right inferior frontal gyrus in humans [J].
Aron, AR ;
Fletcher, PC ;
Bullmore, ET ;
Sahakian, BJ ;
Robbins, TW .
NATURE NEUROSCIENCE, 2003, 6 (02) :115-116
[3]   Horse-race model simulations of the stop-signal procedure [J].
Band, GPH ;
van der Molen, MW ;
Logan, GD .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 2003, 112 (02) :105-142
[4]   Conflict monitoring and cognitive control [J].
Botvinick, MM ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Carter, CS ;
Cohen, JD .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 2001, 108 (03) :624-652
[5]   Anterior cingulate cortex and response conflict: Effects of frequency, inhibition and errors [J].
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Gray, JR ;
Molfese, DL ;
Snyder, A .
CEREBRAL CORTEX, 2001, 11 (09) :825-836
[6]   Inhibition, response mode, and stimulus probability: a comparative event-related potential study [J].
Bruin, KJ ;
Wijers, AA .
CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 2002, 113 (07) :1172-1182
[7]   Anterior cingulate cortex, error detection, and the online monitoring of performance [J].
Carter, CS ;
Braver, TS ;
Barch, DM ;
Botvinick, MM ;
Noll, D ;
Cohen, JD .
SCIENCE, 1998, 280 (5364) :747-749
[8]   A developmental functional MRI study of prefrontal activation during performance of a Go-No-Go task [J].
Casey, BJ ;
Trainor, RJ ;
Orendi, JL ;
Schubert, AB ;
Nystrom, LE ;
Giedd, JN ;
Castellanos, FX ;
Haxby, JV ;
Noll, DC ;
Cohen, JD ;
Forman, SD ;
Dahl, RE ;
Rapoport, JL .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1997, 9 (06) :835-847
[9]   IN SEARCH OF THE POINT OF NO RETURN - THE CONTROL OF RESPONSE PROCESSES [J].
DEJONG, R ;
COLES, MGH ;
LOGAN, GD ;
GRATTON, G .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-HUMAN PERCEPTION AND PERFORMANCE, 1990, 16 (01) :164-182
[10]   Inhibitory motor control in children with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: Event-related potentials in the stop-signal paradigm [J].
Dimoska, A ;
Johnstone, SJ ;
Barry, RJ ;
Clarke, AR .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2003, 54 (12) :1345-1354