A randomized trial of topical anesthesia comparing lidocaine versus lidocaine plus xylometazoline for unsedated transnasal upper gastrointestinal endoscopy

被引:18
作者
Cheung, Justin [1 ]
Goodman, Karen J.
Bailey, Robert [3 ]
Fedorak, Richard N.
Morse, John
Milian, Mario [4 ]
Guzowski, Tom [2 ]
van Zanten, Sander Veldhuyzen
机构
[1] Univ Alberta, Div Gastroenterol, Zeidler Ledcor Ctr, Edmonton, AB T6G 2X8, Canada
[2] Stanton Terr Hosp, Yellowknife, NT, Canada
[3] Univ Alberta Hosp, Royal Alexandra Hosp, Edmonton, AB T6G 2B7, Canada
[4] Misericordia Hosp, Edmonton, AB, Canada
来源
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY | 2010年 / 24卷 / 05期
基金
加拿大健康研究院;
关键词
Topical anesthesia; Transnasal endoscopy; Ultrathin; OUTPATIENT GASTROENTEROLOGY PRACTICE; ULTRATHIN VIDEOENDOSCOPE; NASAL ANESTHESIA; ESOPHAGOGASTRODUODENOSCOPY; EGD; GASTROSCOPY; EXPERIENCE; TOLERANCE; SAFETY;
D O I
10.1155/2010/154791
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
BACKGROUND: The optimal topical anesthesia regimen for unsedated transnasal endoscopy is unknown. The addition of a nasal decongestant, such as xylometazoline (X), to a topical anesthestic may improve patient comfort. OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness of lidocaine (L) versus L plus X (LX) for anesthesia in unsedated transnasal endoscopy. METHODS: Consecutive participants of the Aklavik Helicobacter pylori project were prospectively randomly assigned to receive LX or L for unsedated transnasal 4.9 mm ultrathin endoscopy. The primary outcome was overall procedure discomfort on a validated 10-point visual analogue scale (1 = no discomfort, 10 = severe discomfort). Secondary outcomes included pain, endoscope insertion difficulty, gagging, adverse events and encounter times. Results were presented as mean +/- SD, difference in mean, 95% CI. RESULTS: A total of 181 patients were randomly assigned to receive LX (n=94) and L (n=87). Baseline characteristics between the two groups were similar (mean age 40 years, 59% women). Overall, patient procedural discomfort with LX and L were 4.2 +/- 2.4 versus 3.9 +/- 2.1, respectively (0.29; 95% CI -0.39 to 0.96). Transnasal insertion difficulty was significantly lower with LX than with L (2.4 2.1 versus 3.2 +/- 2.8, respectively [-0.80; 95% CI -1.54 to -0.06]). Compared with L, the use of LX was associated with significantly less time needed to apply anesthesia (2.4 +/- 1.8 min versus 3.5 +/- 2.2 min, respectively [-1.10; 95% CI -1.71 min to -0.50 min]) and less time for insertion (3.2 +/- 1.8 min versus 3.9 +/- 2.2 min, respectively [-0.70 min; 95% CI -1.30 min to -0.10 min]). Epistaxis was rare but occurred less frequently with LX (1.1%) than with L (4.6%) (P=0.19). CONCLUSIONS: LX did not improve patient comfort for transnasal endoscopy compared with L alone. However, LX was associated with less difficulty with endoscope transnasal insertion and reduced insertion time. Further studies on the optimal regimen and dosing of anesthesia are required.
引用
收藏
页码:317 / 321
页数:5
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]
A comparison of transnasal and transoral oesophagogastroduodenoscopy [J].
Bampton, PA ;
Reid, DP ;
Johnson, RD ;
Fitch, RJ ;
Dent, J .
JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY AND HEPATOLOGY, 1998, 13 (06) :579-584
[2]
Birkner B, 2003, ENDOSCOPY, V35, P647
[3]
Transnasal gastroscopy compared to conventional gastroscopy: A randomized study of feasibility, safety, and tolerance [J].
Campo, R ;
Montserrat, A ;
Brullet, E .
ENDOSCOPY, 1998, 30 (05) :448-452
[4]
Early experience with unsedated ultrathin 4.9 mm transnasal gastroscopy: A pilot study [J].
Cheung, Justin ;
Bailey, Robert ;
van Zanten, Sander Veldhuyzen ;
McLean, Ross ;
Fedorak, Richard N. ;
Morse, John ;
Millan, Mario ;
Guzowski, Tom ;
Goodman, Karen J. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 22 (11) :917-922
[5]
Helicobacter pylori infection in Canada's arctic: Searching for the solutions [J].
Cheung, Justin ;
Goodman, Karen ;
Munday, Rachel ;
Heavner, Karen ;
Huntington, Janis ;
Morse, John ;
van Zanten, Sander Veldhuyzen ;
Fedorak, Richard N. ;
Corriveau, Andre ;
Bailey, Robert J. .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 22 (11) :912-916
[6]
Unsedated transnasal endoscopy: A Canadian experience in daily practice [J].
Cho, Sarah ;
Arya, Naveen ;
Swan, Katherine ;
Cirocco, Maria ;
Kandel, Gabor ;
Kortan, Paul ;
Marcon, Norman .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 22 (03) :243-246
[7]
Unsedated transnasal EGD in daily practice: results with 1100 consecutive patients [J].
Dumortier, J ;
Napoleon, B ;
Hedelius, F ;
Pellissier, PE ;
Leprince, E ;
Pujol, B ;
Ponchon, T .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2003, 57 (02) :198-204
[8]
Prospective evaluation of a new ultrathin one-plane bending videoendoscope for transnasal EGD: a comparative study on performance and tolerance [J].
Dumortier, Jerome ;
Josso, Claire ;
Roman, Sabine ;
Fumex, Fabien ;
Lepilliez, Vincent ;
Prost, Benedicte ;
Lot, Muriel ;
Guillaud, Olivier ;
Petit-Laurent, Fabien ;
Lapalus, Marie-George ;
Ponchon, Thierry .
GASTROINTESTINAL ENDOSCOPY, 2007, 66 (01) :13-19
[9]
Endoscopic-guided Versus cotton-tipped applicator methods of nasal anesthesia for transnasal esophagogastroduodenoscopy:: A randomized, prospective, controlled study [J].
Hu, Chi-Tan .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2008, 103 (05) :1114-1121
[10]
Topical nasal anesthesia for transnasal fiberoptic laryngoscopy: A prospective, double-blind, cross-over study [J].
Johnson, PE ;
Belafsky, PC ;
Postma, GN .
OTOLARYNGOLOGY-HEAD AND NECK SURGERY, 2003, 128 (04) :452-454