Caudal anaesthesia with 0.375% ropivacaine or 0.375% bupivacaine in paediatric patients

被引:54
作者
Da Conceicao, MJ
Coelho, L
机构
[1] Joana Gusmao Children Hosp, Dept Anaesthesiol, BR-88025301 Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
[2] Univ Fed Santa Catarina, Dept Anaesthesiol, Florianopolis, SC, Brazil
关键词
anaesthesia; paediatric; anaesthetic techniques; regional; caudal; analgesia; postoperative; anaesthetics local; ropivacaine; bupivacaine;
D O I
10.1093/bja/80.4.507
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We have determined the effectiveness and degree of motor block produced by the new local anaesthetic, ropivacaine, when used for caudal anaesthesia in children. We studied 60 children, aged 3-6 yr, ASA I, allocated randomly in a double-blind manner, to receive one of two local anaesthetics: 0.375% ropivacaine 1.0 mi kg(-1) or 0.375% bupivacaine 1.0 mi kg(-1). Patients were anaesthetized with continuous infusion of propofol 200 mu g kg(-1) min(-1). The lungs were ventilated with 50% nitrous oxide in oxygen. Heart rate and arterial pressure were measured every 5 min after administration of local anaesthetic until discharge from the recovery room. The extent of motor block in the recovery room was scored as 1-3. Adverse events and time to first analgesic requirements were recorded. Patients in the two groups did not differ in age, weight or height. There were no differences in heart rate or arterial pressure between the two groups. No adverse events were observed. The degree of motor block was significantly different between the two groups. The ropivacaine group showed a shorter duration of motor block than the bupivacaine group (P<0.05). Postoperative analgesia was required at a mean time of 5 (so 3.2) h in the ropivacaine group compared with 5 (2.8) h in the bupivacaine group. These findings suggest that caudal anaesthesia with ropivacaine in paediatric patients is effective and produces less motor block in the postoperative period.
引用
收藏
页码:507 / 508
页数:2
相关论文
共 6 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF EXTRADURAL ROPIVACAINE AND BUPIVACAINE [J].
BROCKWAY, MS ;
BANNISTER, J ;
MCCLURE, JH ;
MCKEOWN, D ;
WILDSMITH, JAW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1991, 66 (01) :31-37
[2]  
Bromage P R, 1965, Acta Anaesthesiol Scand Suppl, V16, P55
[3]   MEASUREMENT OF PAIN IN CHILDREN WITH SELF-REPORTING AND BEHAVIORAL-ASSESSMENT [J].
MAUNUKSELA, EL ;
OLKKOLA, KT ;
KORPELA, R .
CLINICAL PHARMACOLOGY & THERAPEUTICS, 1987, 42 (02) :137-141
[4]   CONTINUOUS EXTRADURAL ANESTHESIA IN CHILDREN - CLINICAL AND HEMODYNAMIC IMPLICATIONS [J].
MURAT, I ;
DELLEUR, MM ;
ESTEVE, C ;
EGU, JF ;
RAYNAUD, P ;
SAINTMAURICE, C .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF ANAESTHESIA, 1987, 59 (11) :1441-1450
[5]   ACUTE TOXICITY OF ROPIVACAINE COMPARED WITH THAT OF BUPIVACAINE [J].
SCOTT, DB ;
LEE, A ;
FAGAN, D ;
BOWLER, GMR ;
BLOOMFIELD, P ;
LUNDH, R .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1989, 69 (05) :563-569
[6]   BLOCKADE OF THE ABDOMINAL MUSCLES MEASURED BY EMG DURING LUMBAR EPIDURAL ANALGESIA WITH ROPIVACAINE - A DOUBLE-BLIND-STUDY [J].
ZARIC, D ;
AXELSSON, K ;
PHILIPSON, L ;
NYDAHL, PA ;
LARSSON, P ;
JANSSON, JR ;
LEISSNER, P .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1993, 37 (03) :274-280