Setting the public agenda for online health search: A white paper and action agenda

被引:38
作者
Greenberg, L
D'Andrea, G
Lorence, D
机构
[1] Penn State Univ, University Pk, PA 16802 USA
[2] URAC, Washington, DC 20005 USA
关键词
eHealth; Internet; information management; health services research; quality of health care; consumer participation; patient education;
D O I
10.2196/jmir.6.2.e18
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Searches for health information are among the most common reasons that consumers use the Internet. Both consumers and quality experts have raised concerns about the quality of information on the Web and the ability of consumers to find accurate information that meets their needs. Objective: To produce a national stakeholder-driven agenda for research, technical improvements, and education that will improve the results of consumer searches for health information on the internet. Methods: URAC, a national accreditation organization, and Consumer WebWatch (CWW), a project of Consumers Union (a consumer advocacy organization), conducted a review of factors influencing the results of online health searches. The organizations convened two stakeholder groups of consumers, quality experts, search engine experts, researchers, health-care providers, informatics specialists, and others. Meeting participants reviewed existing information and developed recommendations for improving the results of online consumer searches for health information. Participants were not asked to vote on or endorse the recommendations. Our working definition of a quality Web site was one that contained accurate, reliable, and complete information. Results: The Internet has greatly improved access to health information for consumers. There is great variation in how consumers seek information via the Internet, and in how successful they are in searching for health information. Further, there is variation among Web sites, both in quality and accessibility. Many Web site features affect the capability of search engines to find and index them. Conclusions: Research is needed to define quality elements of Web sites that could be retrieved by search engines and understand how to meet the needs of different types of searchers. Technological research should seek to develop more sophisticated approaches for tagging information, and to develop searches that "learn" from consumer behavior. Finally, education initiatives are needed to help consumers search more effectively and to help them critically evaluate the information they find.
引用
收藏
页数:12
相关论文
共 36 条
[1]  
*AM MED ASS, GUID MED HLTH INF SI
[2]   Health information on the Internet -: Accessibility, quality, and readability in English and Spanish [J].
Berland, GK ;
Elliott, MN ;
Morales, LS ;
Algazy, JI ;
Kravitz, RL ;
Broder, MS ;
Kanouse, DE ;
Muñoz, JA ;
Puyol, JA ;
Lara, M ;
Watkins, KE ;
Yang, H ;
McGlynn, EA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (20) :2612-2621
[3]  
Brown P, 2002, BRIT MED J, V324, P566
[4]  
*CTR INF THER, PRESCR STRENGTH INF
[5]   How do consumers search for and appraise health information on the world wide web?: Qualitative study using focus groups, usability tests, and in-depth interviews [J].
Eysenbach, G ;
Köhler, C .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7337) :573-577
[6]   Empirical studies assessing the quality of health information for consumers on the World Wide Web - A systematic review [J].
Eysenbach, G ;
Powell, J ;
Kuss, O ;
Sa, ER .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 287 (20) :2691-2700
[7]  
FOGG BJ, 2002, HOW PEOPLE EVALUATE
[8]  
Fox S., 2003, INTERNET HLTH RESOUR
[9]  
Fox S., 2002, SEARCH ENGINES PEW I
[10]   Examination of instruments used to rate quality of health information on the internet: chronicle of a voyage with an unclear destination [J].
Gagliardi, A ;
Jadad, AR .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2002, 324 (7337) :569-573