Towards an optimal model for community-based diabetes care: design and baseline data from the Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project

被引:16
作者
Dinneen, SF
Bjornsen, SS
Bryant, SC
Zimmerman, BR
Gorman, CA
Knudsen, JB
Rizza, RA
Smith, SA
机构
[1] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Div Endocrinol Nutr & Metab, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[2] Mayo Clin & Mayo Fdn, Dept Hlth Serv Evaluat, Rochester, MN 55905 USA
[3] Novo Nordisk Pharmaceut, Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
computers; decision support; demonstration project;
D O I
10.1046/j.1365-2753.2000.00247.x
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of the Mayo Health System Diabetes Translation Project is to assess the impact of three different models of care on the overall quality of diabetes care in the community. The unit of study is the primary care practice with a different model of care implemented at each of three sites. The design incorporates a comparison of a diabetes guideline implementation team initiative (Practice model A), a guideline initiative combined with clinical use of a Diabetes Electronic Management System (DEMS) by primary care providers (Practice model B) and a guideline initiative combined with DEMS utilization combined with electronic review of DEMS patient encounters by an endocrinologist (Practice model C). Administrative data sets were used to define the patient population at each practice. Patients were designated as new, attending or non-attending based on their pattern of visits over the preceding 12 months. A random sample of 200 charts from attending patients at each site was audited at baseline for diabetes-related process and outcome measures. This audit will be repeated yearly during the 2 years of the project. Baseline data revealed significant differences across sites in adherence to certain key indicators of the quality of diabetes care including: frequency of documentation of eye examinations (19, 39 and 37% for sites A, B and C, respectively), haemoglobin A1c monitoring (64, 89 and 77%) and microalbumin monitoring (3, 15 and 6%). The interventions being assessed in this study include traditional (diabetes education; guideline implementation) and modern (DEMS; telemedicine specialist review) methods for improving the quality of diabetes care. In spite of variation in baseline quality indicators, the setting and design should lead to broad applicability of the results and help determine an optimal model of diabetes care in the community.
引用
收藏
页码:421 / 429
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Nurse case management to improve glycemic control in diabetic patients in a health maintenance organization - A randomized, controlled trial [J].
Aubert, RE ;
Herman, WH ;
Waters, J ;
Moore, W ;
Sutton, D ;
Peterson, BL ;
Bailey, CM ;
Koplan, JP .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1998, 129 (08) :605-+
[2]  
Bjornsen S, 1998, DIABETES, V47, pA184
[3]   Quality of care .1. What is it? [J].
Blumenthal, D .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (12) :891-894
[4]  
Bradley C., 1994, Handbook of Psychology and Diabetes: A Guide to Psychological Measurement in Diabetes Research and Practice, P111
[5]   Quality of health care .2. Measuring quality of care [J].
Brook, RH ;
McGlynn, EA ;
Cleary, PD .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1996, 335 (13) :966-970
[6]   Diabetes research and diabetes care - Where do we stand? [J].
Davidson, MB .
DIABETES CARE, 1998, 21 (12) :2152-2160
[7]  
DEPARLE N, 1998, FED REGISTER, V63, P13260
[8]  
Eastman RC, 1997, LANCET, V350, pSI29
[9]   A clinically useful diabetes electronic medical record: Lessons from the past; Pointers toward the future [J].
Gorman, C ;
Looker, J ;
Fisk, T ;
Oelke, W ;
Erickson, D ;
Smith, S ;
Zimmerman, B .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF ENDOCRINOLOGY, 1996, 134 (01) :31-42
[10]  
Griffin S, 1998, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V317, P390