Group II introns as phylogenetic tools: Structure function, and evolutionary constraints

被引:110
作者
Kelchner, SA [1 ]
机构
[1] CSIRO, Ctr Plant Biodivers Res, Div Plant Ind, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
[2] Australian Natl Univ, Sch Bot & Zool, Canberra, ACT 2601, Australia
关键词
chloroplast noncoding DNA; group II introns; molecular evolution; phylogenetic analysis; RNA structure; rpl16; intron;
D O I
10.3732/ajb.89.10.1651
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Group II introns comprise the majority of noncoding DNA in many plant chloroplast genomes and include the commonly sequenced regions trnK/matK, the rps16 intron, and the rpl16 intron. As demand increases for nucleotide characters at lower taxonomic levels, chloroplast introns may come to provide the bulk of plastome sequence data for assessment of evolutionary relationships in infrageneric, intergeneric, and interfamilial studies. Group II introns have many attractive properties for the molecular systematist: they are confined to organellar genomes in eukaryotes and the majority are single-copy; they share a well-defined and empirically tested secondary and tertiary structure; and many are easily amplified due to highly conserved sequence in flanking exons. However, structure-linked mutation patterns in group It intron sequences are more complex than generally supposed and have important implications for aligning nucleotides, assessing mutational biases in the data, and selecting appropriate models of character evolution for phylogenetic analysis. This paper presents a summary of group H intron function and structure, reviews the link between that structure and specific mutational constraints in group II intron sequences, and discusses strategies for accommodating the resulting complex mutational patterns in subsequent phylogenetic analyses.
引用
收藏
页码:1651 / 1669
页数:19
相关论文
共 208 条
[1]   Catalytic role of 2'-hydroxyl groups within a group II intron active site [J].
Abramovitz, DL ;
Friedman, RA ;
Pyle, AM .
SCIENCE, 1996, 271 (5254) :1410-1413
[2]  
Andersen J. B., 1995, IEEE Transactions on Rehabilitation Engineering, V3, P299, DOI 10.1109/86.481969
[3]   Molecular phylogeny of the tribe Anthospermeae (Rubiaceae): Systematic and biogeographic implications [J].
Anderson, CL ;
Rova, JHE ;
Andersson, L .
AUSTRALIAN SYSTEMATIC BOTANY, 2001, 14 (02) :231-244
[4]   The rps16 intron and the phylogeny of the Rubioideae (Rubiaceae) [J].
Andersson, L ;
Rova, JHE .
PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 1999, 214 (1-4) :161-186
[5]   Phylogeny and classification of Marantaceae [J].
Andersson, L ;
Chase, MW .
BOTANICAL JOURNAL OF THE LINNEAN SOCIETY, 2001, 135 (03) :275-287
[6]   A molecular phylogeny of Tropaeolaceae and its systematic implications [J].
Andersson, L ;
Andersson, S .
TAXON, 2000, 49 (04) :721-736
[7]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[8]  
[Anonymous], MOL SYSTEMATICS PLAN
[9]   Phylogeny of the Madagascan endemic family Didiereaceae [J].
Applequist, WL ;
Wallace, RS .
PLANT SYSTEMATICS AND EVOLUTION, 2000, 221 (3-4) :157-166
[10]   Chloroplast DNA characters, phylogeny, and classification of Lathyrus (Fabaceae) [J].
Asmussen, CB ;
Liston, A .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF BOTANY, 1998, 85 (03) :387-401