Prognostic value of urokinase plasminogen activator in primary breast carcinoma:: comparison of two immunoassay methods

被引:19
作者
Bouchet, C
Spyratos, F
Hacène, K
Durcos, L
Bécette, V
Oglobine, J
机构
[1] Ctr Rene Huguenin, Lab Immunochim, F-92211 St Cloud, France
[2] Ctr Rene Huguenin, Lab Biol Tissulaire, F-92211 St Cloud, France
[3] Ctr Rene Huguenin, Dept Med Stat, F-92211 St Cloud, France
[4] Ctr Rene Huguenin, Dept Anatomocytopathol, F-92211 St Cloud, France
关键词
urokinase plasminogen activator; luminometric immunoassay; prognosis; breast cancer;
D O I
10.1038/bjc.1998.246
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) is a potentially important prognostic factor in breast cancer for identifying patients at high risk of recurrence. This retrospective study assessed two enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) methods measuring uPA antigen levels in 499 primary breast cancer cytosols. Both uPA methods were applied to cytosols used routinely for oestrogen (ER) and progesterone (PgR) receptor assays. uPA was determined using a classical ELISA method (Imubind; American Diagnostica) and a novel automatic immunoluminometric assay (Lia; Sangtec Medical). The uPA Imubind method revealed about twice as much uPA antigen (median 0.75 ng mg(-1) protein) as the uPA Lia method (median 0.38 ng mg(-1) protein). The correlation coefficient between the two methods was acceptable (r = 0.81), but the two techniques are not interchangeable. Univariate analyses confirmed the poor outcome of patients whose tumours contained large amounts of uPA, regardless of the technique used. Multivariate analyses showed that uPA Imubind and uPA Lia values were both strong independent prognostic factors.
引用
收藏
页码:1495 / 1501
页数:7
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]   Immunoassays (ELISA) of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA): Report of an EORTC/BIOMED-1 workshop [J].
Benraad, TJ ;
GeurtsMoespot, J ;
GrondahlHansen, J ;
Schmitt, M ;
Heuvel, JJTM ;
deWitte, JH ;
Foekens, JA ;
Leake, RE ;
Brunner, N ;
Sweep, CGJ .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1996, 32A (08) :1371-1381
[2]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[3]   HISTOLOGICAL GRADING AND PROGNOSIS IN BREAST CANCER - A STUDY OF 1409 CASES OF WHICH 359 HAVE BEEN FOLLOWED FOR 15 YEARS [J].
BLOOM, HJG ;
RICHARDSON, WW .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1957, 11 (03) :359-&
[4]   PROGNOSTIC VALUE OF UROKINASE-TYPE PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR (UPA) AND PLASMINOGEN-ACTIVATOR INHIBITORS PAI-1 AND PAI-2 IN BREAST CARCINOMAS [J].
BOUCHET, C ;
SPYRATOS, F ;
MARTIN, PM ;
HACENE, K ;
GENTILE, A ;
OGLOBINE, J .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1994, 69 (02) :398-405
[5]   Influence of the extraction procedure on plasminogen activator inhibitor-2 (PAI-2) and urokinase receptor (uPAR) assays in breast cancer tissues [J].
BouchetBernet, C ;
Spyratos, F ;
Andrieu, C ;
Deytieux, S ;
Becette, V ;
Oglobine, J .
BREAST CANCER RESEARCH AND TREATMENT, 1996, 41 (02) :141-146
[6]  
Cho JY, 1997, CANCER, V79, P878, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19970301)79:5<878::AID-CNCR2>3.3.CO
[7]  
2-N
[8]  
COX DR, 1972, J R STAT SOC B, V34, P187
[9]   PLASMINOGEN ACTIVATORS, TISSUE DEGRADATION, AND CANCER [J].
DANO, K ;
ANDREASEN, PA ;
GRONDAHLHANSEN, J ;
KRISTENSEN, P ;
NIELSEN, LS ;
SKRIVER, L .
ADVANCES IN CANCER RESEARCH, 1985, 44 :139-266
[10]  
DUFFY MJ, 1988, CANCER, V62, P531, DOI 10.1002/1097-0142(19880801)62:3<531::AID-CNCR2820620315>3.0.CO