Predicting drift from field spraying by means of a 3D computational fluid dynamics model

被引:115
作者
Baetens, K.
Nuyttens, D.
Verboven, P.
De Schampheleire, M.
Nicolai, B.
Ramon, H.
机构
[1] Catholic Univ Louvain, BIOSYST, MeBioS, B-3001 Heverlee, Belgium
[2] ILVO, Inst Flemish Commun, Unit Technol & Food Agr Engn, B-9820 Merelbeke, Belgium
[3] Univ Ghent, Dept Crop Protect, B-9000 Ghent, Belgium
关键词
spray drift; field sprayer; computer simulation; model; sensitivity analysis; crop protection;
D O I
10.1016/j.compag.2007.01.009
中图分类号
S [农业科学];
学科分类号
09 ;
摘要
In order to investigate and understand drift from field sprayers, a steady state computational fluid dynamics (CFD) model was developed. The model was developed in 3D in order to increase the understanding of the causes of drift: a deviation in the wind direction cannot be captured by a 2D approach, the wake behind a wind screen is not symmetrical, the effects of a changed nozzle orientation may not be symmetrical. The model's accuracy was validated with field experiments carried out according to the international standard ISO 22866. A field sprayer with a spray boom width of 27 in and 54 nozzles (Hardi ISO F1 10-03 at 3 bar) was driving at 2.22 m/s over a flat pasture. During the experiments the wind direction was perpendicular to the tractor track. The model explained the variation in drift replicates during each single field experiment through varying boom height (0.3-0.7 m), wind velocity (1.3-2.5 m/s), wind deviation (-18 degrees to + 18 degrees) from the direction perpendicular to the tractor track and injection velocity of the droplets (17-27 m/s). Boom movements had the highest impact on the variations in drift values (deviations in drift deposits of 25%), followed by variation in wind velocity (deviations in drift deposits of 3%) and injection velocity of the droplets (deviations in drift deposits of 2.5%). Wind deviation from the direction perpendicular to the tractor track had a reducing effect on the drift values (deviations in drift deposits of 2%). Small variations in driving speed had little influence on drift values. Near drift (< 5 m) is predicted well by the model but the increased complexity compromised the predictions at greater distances. The model will be further developed in order to improve far drift prediction. Dynamic simulations will be performed and the model for turbulent dispersion will be optimized. The model did not require calibration. (c) 2007 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:161 / 173
页数:13
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2005, 22866 ISO
[2]  
Bayvel L.Z. Orzechowski., 1993, Liquid Atomization
[3]   CFD simulation of the atmospheric boundary layer: wall function problems [J].
Blocken, Bert ;
Stathopoulos, Ted ;
Carmeliet, Jan .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2007, 41 (02) :238-252
[4]   Computation of turbulent evaporating sprays with well-specified measurements: A sensitivity study on droplet properties [J].
Chen, XQ ;
Pereira, JCF .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF HEAT AND MASS TRANSFER, 1996, 39 (03) :441-454
[5]   Modelling and validation of the air flow generated by a cross flow air sprayer as affected by travel speed and fan speed [J].
Delele, MA ;
De Moor, A ;
Sonck, B ;
Ramon, H ;
Nicolaï, BM ;
Verboven, P .
BIOSYSTEMS ENGINEERING, 2005, 92 (02) :165-174
[6]   Emission of pesticides to the air during sprayer application: A bibliographic review [J].
Gil, Y ;
Sinfort, C .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 2005, 39 (28) :5183-5193
[7]  
Gosman A. D., 1981, 810323 AIAA
[8]  
HERBST A, 2001, ASAE M
[9]   Modelling spray drift from boom sprayers [J].
Holterman, HJ ;
van de Zande, JC ;
Porskamp, HAJ ;
Huijsmans, JFM .
COMPUTERS AND ELECTRONICS IN AGRICULTURE, 1997, 19 (01) :1-22
[10]   DRAG COEFFICIENT AND RELATIVE VELOCITY IN BUBBLY, DROPLET OR PARTICULATE FLOWS [J].
ISHII, M ;
ZUBER, N .
AICHE JOURNAL, 1979, 25 (05) :843-855