Evaluation of neural network streamflow forecasting on 47 watersheds

被引:69
作者
Anctil, F
Rat, A
机构
[1] Univ Laval, Dept Genie Civil, Quebec City, PQ G1K 7P4, Canada
[2] Irstea, Water Qual & Hydrol Res Unit, F-92163 Antony, France
关键词
neural networks; streamflow forecasting; rainfall-runoff relationship; performance evaluation; watersheds;
D O I
10.1061/(ASCE)1084-0699(2005)10:1(85)
中图分类号
TU [建筑科学];
学科分类号
0813 ;
摘要
This study is designed to compare 1 day ahead streamflow forecasting performance of multiple-layer perceptron (MLP) networks implemented at a daily time step for 47 watersheds spread across France and Central United States. In order to keep the task to manageable proportions, a large sample of test watersheds asks for a reduction of the number of steps in the net-work implementation procedure. This is achieved by eliminating the long trial and error process of input selection. Results show that it is feasible to obtain good 1 day ahead streamflow forecasting performance from simple MLPs and input vectors consisting solely of the last observed streamflow and a predetermined range of precipitation observations that is roughly equal to the time of concentration of the watersheds. Also intuitive preprocessing such as differencing the strearnflow noticeably improves the forecasting performance in almost all instances On the other hand, consideration of the potential evapotranspiration as an additional input decreases the MLP's performance in the majority of instances. Finally, it is noteworthy that there is a general trend between the watershed runoff coefficients and the ability of the MLPs to correctly map 1 day ahead streamflows.
引用
收藏
页码:85 / 88
页数:4
相关论文
共 27 条
[1]   Impact of the length of observed records on the performance of ANN and of conceptual parsimonious rainfall-runoff forecasting models [J].
Anctil, F ;
Perrin, C ;
Andréassian, V .
ENVIRONMENTAL MODELLING & SOFTWARE, 2004, 19 (04) :357-368
[2]   A soil moisture index as an auxiliary ANN input for stream flow forecasting [J].
Anctil, F ;
Michel, C ;
Perrin, C ;
Andréassian, V .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2004, 286 (1-4) :155-167
[3]   A comparison between neural-network forecasting techniques - Case study: River flow forecasting [J].
Atiya, AF ;
El-Shoura, SM ;
Shaheen, SI ;
El-Sherif, MS .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON NEURAL NETWORKS, 1999, 10 (02) :402-409
[4]   Performance of neural networks in daily streamflow forecasting [J].
Birikundavyi, S ;
Labib, R ;
Trung, HT ;
Rousselle, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2002, 7 (05) :392-398
[5]   River flood forecasting with a neural network model [J].
Campolo, M ;
Andreussi, P ;
Soldati, A .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (04) :1191-1197
[6]   Hydrological forecasting with artificial neural networks:: The state of the art [J].
Coulibaly, P ;
Anctil, F ;
Bobée, B .
CANADIAN JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING, 1999, 26 (03) :293-304
[7]   Multivariate reservoir inflow forecasting using temporal neural networks [J].
Coulibaly, P ;
Anctil, F ;
Bobée, B .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGIC ENGINEERING, 2001, 6 (05) :367-376
[8]   Hydrological modelling using artificial neural networks [J].
Dawson, CW ;
Wilby, RL .
PROGRESS IN PHYSICAL GEOGRAPHY-EARTH AND ENVIRONMENT, 2001, 25 (01) :80-108
[9]  
Govindaraju RS, 2000, J HYDROL ENG, V5, P124
[10]  
Govindaraju RS, 2000, J HYDROL ENG, V5, P115