Technical challenges in a program of carotid artery stenting

被引:47
作者
Choi, HM
Hobson, RW
Goldstein, J
Chakhtoura, E
Lal, BK
Haser, PB
Cuadra, SA
Padberg, FT
Jamil, Z
机构
[1] Univ Med & Dent New Jersey, New Jersey Med Sch, Div Vasc Surg, Dept Surg, Newark, NJ 07101 USA
[2] St Michael Med Ctr, Dept Med, Div Cardiol, Newark, NJ USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.jvs.2004.07.021
中图分类号
R61 [外科手术学];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: Successful carotid artery stenting (CAS) involves gaining access to the common carotid artery, characterizing and crossing the lesion, deploying an anti-embolic device and stent, and retrieving the anti-embolic device. These steps are critical determinants of the complexity of the procedure. The frequency with which technical challenges are encountered during CAS is ill-defined. The purpose of this investigation was to review the incidence and types of technical challenges encountered during CAS and determine their effect on outcome. Methods: Data were prospectively collected for 194 consecutive CAS procedures (177 patients) and separated into group 1, standard CAS technique, and group 2, procedures with technical challenges requiring modifications to the technique. Technical challenges were defined as difficult femoral arterial access (aortoiliac occlusive disease), complex aortic arch anatomy (elongated or bovine arch, deep takeoff of the innominate artery, tandem stenoses (CCA, innominate artery), difficult internal carotid artery anatomy (tortuosity, high-grade stenosis), and circumferential internal carotid artery calcification. The incidence of technical challenges, types of technical modifications required, and effect on outcomes were determined. Results. Fifty technically challenging situations (26%) were encountered in 194 CAS procedures (group 2), which required advanced technical skills. Standard methodols were used in the other 144 procedures (group 1, 74%). No significant differences in 30-day stroke and death rates were noted between the groups (group 1, 3.1%; group 2, 2.0%; P =.564). Conclusions: Twenty-six percent of the procedures required a modification in the standard technique for successful CAS. Circumferential calcification and severe tortuosity continue to be relative contraindications to CAS. Recognition of these technical challenges and increasing facility with the methods to manage them will enable expanded use of CAS without increased morbidity and mortality.
引用
收藏
页码:746 / 751
页数:6
相关论文
共 27 条
  • [1] Al-Mubarak N, 2001, J ENDOVASC THER, V8, P571, DOI 10.1583/1545-1550(2001)008<0571:CSWDBP>2.0.CO
  • [2] 2
  • [3] Brown MM, 2001, LANCET, V357, P1729
  • [4] Protected carotid stenting - Clinical advantages and complications of embolic protection devices in 442 consecutive patients
    Cremonesi, A
    Manetti, R
    Setacci, F
    Setacci, C
    Castriota, F
    [J]. STROKE, 2003, 34 (08) : 1936 - 1941
  • [5] Technical aspects and current results of carotid stenting
    d'Audiffret, A
    Desgranges, P
    Kobeiter, H
    Becquemin, JP
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2001, 33 (05) : 1001 - 1007
  • [6] Hobson R W 2nd, 2000, Semin Vasc Surg, V13, P139
  • [7] Hobson Robert W 2nd, 2003, Semin Vasc Surg, V16, P311, DOI 10.1053/j.semvascsurg.2003.08.009
  • [8] Carotid artery stenting: Analysis of data for 105 patients at high risk
    Hobson, RW
    Lal, BK
    Chaktoura, E
    Goldstein, J
    Haser, PB
    Kubicka, R
    Cerveira, J
    Pappas, PJ
    Padberg, FT
    Jamil, Z
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2003, 37 (06) : 1234 - 1239
  • [9] Carotid restenosis: Operative and endovascular management
    Hobson, RW
    Goldstein, JE
    Jamil, Z
    Lee, BC
    Padberg, FT
    Hanna, AK
    Gwertzman, GA
    Pappas, PJ
    Silva, MB
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 1999, 29 (02) : 228 - 236
  • [10] Carotid artery closure for endarterectomy does not influence results of angioplasty-stenting for restenosis
    Hobson, RW
    Lal, BK
    Chakhtoura, EY
    Goldstein, J
    Kubicka, R
    Haser, PB
    Padberg, FT
    Pappas, PJ
    Jamil, Z
    [J]. JOURNAL OF VASCULAR SURGERY, 2002, 35 (03) : 435 - 438