Aspects of calculating first-order reversal curve distributions

被引:46
作者
Heslop, D
Muxworthy, AR
机构
[1] Univ Bremen, Fac Geowissensch, D-28334 Bremen, Germany
[2] Univ Edinburgh, Grant Inst Earth Sci, Edinburgh EH9 3JW, Midlothian, Scotland
关键词
FORC diagram; signal-to-noise ratio; spatial autocorrelation;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmmm.2004.09.002
中图分类号
T [工业技术];
学科分类号
08 ;
摘要
The recent development of first-order reversal curve (FORC) diagrams has allowed the detailed investigation of coercivity spectra, interactions, and domain states of fine particle magnetic systems. However, calculation of a FORC distribution from the measured magnetisation data using a second-order trend surface fitted in a piecewise manner (J. Appl. Phys. (1999) 6660; J. Geophys. Res. 105 (2000) 2846 1) can be a time consuming task and it is not yet clear what criteria are suitable for selecting the level of smoothing that should be applied to the data. Here the Convolution method of Savitzky and Golay (Anal. Chern. 36 (1964) 1627) is adapted to a two-dimensional form and is found to accelerate the calculation of a FORC distribution Substantially (by a factor of similar to500), producing results that are identical to those obtained with the existing method. To provide a quantitative measure of the deviation of a smoothed FORC diagram from the measured magnetisation data we present a simple method that allows reconstruction of the smoothed FORCs and an assessment of the signal-to-noise ratio of the data. Finally, a methodology based on spatial autocorrelation (Biometrika (1950) 17) is employed to determine the level of smoothing which can be performed before the smoothing process distorts the representation of the FORC distribution. In numerical tests this method appears to be highly effective in selecting smoothing levels that remove a substantial proportion of the noise contribution from the data without unduly affecting the form of the FORC distribution. (C) 2004 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:155 / 167
页数:13
相关论文
共 21 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1983, PRINCIPLES MEASUREME
[2]   Magnetic interactions and Preisach distributions of nanostructured barium hexaferrite [J].
Bercoff, PG ;
Oliva, MI ;
Borclone, E ;
Bertorello, HR .
PHYSICA B-CONDENSED MATTER, 2002, 320 (1-4) :291-293
[3]  
Bertotti G., 1998, Hysteresis in Magnetism
[4]  
Cliff A. D., 1981, SPATIAL PROCESSES MO
[5]   Thermomagnetic behaviour of haematite and goethite as a function of grain size in various non-saturating magnetic fields [J].
de Boer, CB ;
Dekkers, MJ .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 1998, 133 (03) :541-552
[6]   Computation of the Preisach distribution function based on a measured Everett map [J].
De Wulf, M ;
Vandevelde, L ;
Maes, J ;
Dupré, L ;
Melkebeek, J .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MAGNETICS, 2000, 36 (05) :3141-3143
[7]   MAGNETIC-PROPERTIES OF NATURAL GOETHITE .1. GRAIN-SIZE DEPENDENCE OF SOME LOW-FIELD AND HIGH-FIELD RELATED ROCK-MAGNETIC PARAMETERS MEASURED AT ROOM-TEMPERATURE [J].
DEKKERS, MJ .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL-OXFORD, 1989, 97 (02) :323-340
[8]  
DEKKERS MJ, 1988, THESIS UTRECHT U
[9]  
HARTSTRA RL, 1982, THESIS UTRECHT U
[10]   Magnetic field intensity study of the 1960 Kilauea lava flow, Hawaii, using the microwave palaeointensity technique [J].
Hill, MJ ;
Shaw, J .
GEOPHYSICAL JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL, 2000, 142 (02) :487-504