Comparison of intranasal midazolam with intravenous diazepam for treating febrile seizures in children: prospective randomised study

Objective To compare the safety and efficacy of midazolam given intranasally with diazepam given intravenously in the treatment of children with prolong ed febrile seizures. Design Prospective randomised study Setting Paediatric emergency department in a general hospital. Subjects 47 children aged six months to live years with prolonged febrile seizure (at least 10 minutes) during a 12 month period. Interventions Intranasal midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) and intravenous diazepam (0.3 mg/kg). Main outcome measures Time from arrival at hospital to starting treatment and cessation of seizures. Results Intranasal midazolam and intravenous diazepam were equally effective. Overall, 23 of 26 seizures were controlled with midazolam and 24 out of 26 with diazepam. The mean time from arrival at hospital to starting treatment was significantly shorter in die midazolam group (3.5 (SD 1.8) minutes, 95% confidence interval 3.3 to 3.7) than the diazepam group (5.5 (2.0), 5.3 to 5.7). The mean time to control of seizures was significantly sooner (0.1 (3.6), 6.3 to 6.7) in the midazolam group than the diazepam group (8.0 (0.5), 7.9 to 8.3). No significant side effects were observed in either group. Conclusion Seizures were controlled more quickly with intravenous diazepam than with intranasal midazolam, although midazolam was as safe and effective as diazepam. The overall time to cessation of seizures after arrival at hospital was faster with intranasal midazolam than with intravenous diazepam. The intranasal route can possibly be used not only in medical centres but in general practice and, with appropriate instructions, by families of children with recurrent febrile seizures at home.