Conditioned locomotor stimulant effects of cocaine in rats do not result from interference with habituation

被引:18
作者
Adams, JU
Careri, JM
Efferen, TR
Rotrosen, J
机构
[1] New York Harbor Dept Vet Affairs Med Ctr, Psychopharmacol Lab, New York, NY 10010 USA
[2] NYU, Med Ctr, Dept Psychiat, New York, NY 10016 USA
关键词
cocaine; conditioning; habituation; locomotor activity; rat;
D O I
10.1007/s002130000431
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
Rationale: Classical conditioning has been proposed to account fur the hyperactivity observed in drug-free rats when placed in an environment previously paired with cocaine administration. However, an alternative explanation is that hyperactivity results from an inability of rats to habituate to the environment under the influence of cocaine. Objectives: In this study, preconditioning exposure to the test environment was increased from one session (standard procedure) to seven (modified procedure) to test the "antihabituation" hypothesis. Methods: After preconditioning exposure, six conditioning sessions took place over a 10-day to 13-day period. Paired rats received 10 mg/kg cocaine i.p. prior to activity sessions and saline i.p. upon return to the colony room. Unpaired rats received saline prior to and cocaine after activity sessions. Time-off rats were withheld from the activity boxes, but were subject to all other procedures during conditioning. On the test day, all rats received saline prior to activity sessions. Results: In the standard procedure, paired rats exhibited significantly greater activity than unpaired rats on the test day, consistent with previous reports. In the modified procedure, mean activity (all rats) decreased between the first and last preconditioning sessions. Still, the paired group exhibited granter activity than the unpaired group on the test day, suggesting that a conditioned stimulant effect developed in habituated rats. Activity in the time-off group did not significantly differ from the unpaired group demonstrating the habituation had not dissipated over this time period. Conclusions: These results support the conclusion that hyperactivity observed on the test day was not a result of antihabituation effects of cocaine.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 18
页数:6
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]   Amphetamine induced conditioned activity does not result from a failure of rats to habituate to novelty [J].
Ahmed, SH ;
Oberling, P ;
DiScala, G ;
Sandner, G .
PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1996, 123 (04) :325-332
[2]  
Ahmed SH, 1998, BEHAV NEUROSCI, V112, P1167
[3]   AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED CONDITIONED ACTIVITY IN RATS - COMPARISON WITH NOVELTY-INDUCED ACTIVITY AND ROLE OF THE BASOLATERAL AMYGDALA [J].
AHMED, SH ;
CADOR, M ;
LEMOAL, M ;
STINUS, L .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1995, 109 (04) :723-733
[4]   Sensitization to the psychomotor stimulant effects of amphetamine: Modulation by associative learning [J].
Anagnostaras, SG ;
Robinson, TE .
BEHAVIORAL NEUROSCIENCE, 1996, 110 (06) :1397-1414
[5]   NALOXONE ALTERS LOCOMOTION AND INTERACTION WITH ENVIRONMENTAL STIMULI [J].
ARNSTEN, AT ;
SEGAL, DS .
LIFE SCIENCES, 1979, 25 (12) :1035-1042
[6]   INFLUENCE OF NOVEL VERSUS HOME ENVIRONMENTS ON SENSITIZATION TO THE PSYCHOMOTOR STIMULANT EFFECTS OF COCAINE AND AMPHETAMINE [J].
BADIANI, A ;
BROWMAN, KE ;
ROBINSON, TE .
BRAIN RESEARCH, 1995, 674 (02) :291-298
[7]   CONTEXTUAL POTENTIATION OF ACQUIRED BEHAVIOR AFTER DEVALUING DIRECT CONTEXT-US ASSOCIATIONS [J].
BALAZ, MA ;
CAPRA, S ;
HARTL, P ;
MILLER, RR .
LEARNING AND MOTIVATION, 1981, 12 (04) :383-397
[8]   LATENT INHIBITION OF THE CONDITIONING CONTEXT - FURTHER EVIDENCE OF CONTEXTUAL POTENTIATION OF RETRIEVAL IN THE ABSENCE OF APPRECIABLE CONTEXT UNITED-STATES ASSOCIATIONS [J].
BALAZ, MA ;
CAPRA, S ;
KASPROW, WJ ;
MILLER, RR .
ANIMAL LEARNING & BEHAVIOR, 1982, 10 (02) :242-248
[9]   CLASSICAL-CONDITIONING, DECAY AND EXTINCTION OF COCAINE-INDUCED HYPERACTIVITY AND STEREOTYPY [J].
BARR, GA ;
SHARPLESS, NS ;
COOPER, S ;
SCHIFF, SR ;
PAREDES, W ;
BRIDGER, WH .
LIFE SCIENCES, 1983, 33 (14) :1341-1351
[10]   INITIAL ENVIRONMENT INFLUENCES AMPHETAMINE-INDUCED STEREOTYPY - SUBSEQUENTLY ENVIRONMENT CHANGE HAS LITTLE EFFECT [J].
BECK, CHM ;
CHOW, HL ;
COOPER, SJ .
BEHAVIORAL AND NEURAL BIOLOGY, 1986, 46 (03) :383-397