Accuracy of Hysteroscopic Endomyometrial Biopsy in Diagnosis of Adenomyosis

被引:25
作者
Dakhly, Dina M. R. [1 ,3 ]
Moety, Ghada A. F. Abdel [1 ]
Saber, Waleed [1 ]
Allah, Sherine H. Gad [1 ]
Hashem, Ahmed T. [1 ]
Salam, Lubna O. E. Abdel [2 ]
机构
[1] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Cairo, Egypt
[2] Cairo Univ, Fac Med, Dept Pathol, Cairo, Egypt
[3] 60 Mosadak St, Giza 12311, Egypt
关键词
Adenomyosis; Endomyometrial biopsy; Office hysteroscopy; Sensitivity; Specificity; RISK-FACTORS; TRANSVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY; MYOMETRIAL BIOPSY; HYSTERECTOMY; SONOGRAPHY; PREVALENCE; ULTRASOUND; FEATURES; CRITERIA;
D O I
10.1016/j.jmig.2015.11.004
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Objectives: To investigate the diagnostic accuracy of endomyometrial biopsy obtained via office hysteroscopy for the diagnosis of adenomyosis. Study Design: Cross-sectional study. Setting: Cairo University Teaching Hospital, Cairo, Egypt. Patients: A total of 404 premenopausal women with symptoms clinically suggestive of having adenomyosis. Interventions: All patients were subjected to 2-dimensional transvaginal sonography (TVS) in-office hysteroscopy examination with endomyometrial biopsy. Patients who subsequently underwent hysterectomy were included in the final analysis. Main Measurements and Results: Accuracy of diagnostic modalities was represented using the terms sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and overall accuracy. A total of 292 patients were eligible for final analysis. Of these, 162 (55.47%) were diagnosed with adenomyosis based on hysterectomy specimens. TVS had a high sensitivity (83.95%) and a moderate specificity (60%). In contrast, endomyometrial biopsy was more specific (78.46%) than sensitive (54.32%). Hysteroscopic appearance of the endometrial cavity had low sensitivity (40.74%) and specificity (44.62%). Adding endomyometrial biopsy to TVS improved specificity (89.23%). Conclusion: Endomyometrial biopsy obtained via office hysteroscopy can diagnose adenomyosis with a high specificity and is recommended after TVS. (C) 2016 AAGL. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:364 / 371
页数:8
相关论文
共 40 条
[1]
Adenomyosis: US features with histologic correlation in an in vitro study [J].
Atri, M ;
Reinhold, C ;
Mehio, AR ;
Chapman, WB ;
Bret, PM .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 215 (03) :783-790
[2]
Transvaginal ultrasound in the diagnosis of diffuse adenomyosis [J].
Atzori, E ;
Tronci, C ;
Sionis, L .
GYNECOLOGIC AND OBSTETRIC INVESTIGATION, 1996, 42 (01) :39-41
[3]
AZZIZ R, 1989, OBSTET GYN CLIN N AM, V16, P221
[4]
Limitations of transvaginal sonography for the diagnosis of adenomyosis, with histopathological correlation [J].
Bazot, M ;
Daraï, E ;
Rouger, J ;
Detchev, R ;
Cortez, A ;
Uzan, S .
ULTRASOUND IN OBSTETRICS & GYNECOLOGY, 2002, 20 (06) :605-611
[5]
Ultrasonography compared with magnetic resonance imaging for the diagnosis of adenomyosis: correlation with histopathology [J].
Bazot, M ;
Cortez, A ;
Darai, E ;
Rouger, J ;
Chopier, J ;
Antoine, JM ;
Uzan, S .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (11) :2427-2433
[6]
Prevalence and risk factors of adenomyosis at hysterectomy [J].
Bergholt, T ;
Eriksen, L ;
Berendt, N ;
Jacobsen, M ;
Hertz, JB .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2001, 16 (11) :2418-2421
[7]
SONOGRAPHIC FINDINGS IN ADENOMYOSIS OF THE UTERUS [J].
BOHLMAN, ME ;
ENSOR, RE ;
SANDERS, RC .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1987, 148 (04) :765-766
[8]
ENDOVAGINAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY IN THE DIAGNOSIS OF ADENOMYOSIS UTERI - IDENTIFYING THE PREDICTIVE CHARACTERISTICS [J].
BROSENS, JJ ;
DESOUZA, NM ;
BARKER, FG ;
PARASCHOS, T ;
WINSTON, RML .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1995, 102 (06) :471-474
[9]
Prospective multicentre randomized controlled trial to evaluate factors influencing the success rate of office diagnostic hysteroscopy [J].
Campo, R ;
Molinas, CR ;
Rombauts, L ;
Mestdagh, G ;
Lauwers, M ;
Braekmans, P ;
Brosens, I ;
Van Belle, Y ;
Gordts, S .
HUMAN REPRODUCTION, 2005, 20 (01) :258-263
[10]
Diagnostic value of radiological tests in chronic pelvic pain [J].
Cody, RF ;
Ascher, SM .
BEST PRACTICE & RESEARCH IN CLINICAL OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 2000, 14 (03) :433-466