Representation of the carbon cycle in box models and GCMs - 2. Organic pump

被引:57
作者
Toggweiler, JR
Murnane, R
Carson, S
Gnanadesikan, A
Sarmiento, JL
机构
[1] NOAA, Geophys Fluid Dynam Lab, Princeton, NJ 08648 USA
[2] Bermuda Biol Stn Res Inc, Risk Predict Initiat, Garrett Pk, MD 20896 USA
[3] Princeton Univ, Atmospher & Ocean Sci Program, Princeton, NJ 08544 USA
关键词
ocean carbon cycle; organic pump; box model; gas exchange; preformed nutrients; glacial-interglacial; CO2; INTERGLACIAL CO2 VARIATIONS; ATMOSPHERIC CO2; BOTTOM WATER; OCEAN CIRCULATION; SEA-ICE; DEEP; CHEMISTRY; AIR;
D O I
10.1029/2001GB001841
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
[1] Box models of the ocean/atmosphere CO2 system rely on mechanisms at polar outcrops to alter the strength of the ocean's organic carbon pump. GCM-based carbon system models are reportedly less sensitive to the same processes. Here we separate the carbon pumps in a three-box model and the GCM-based Princeton Ocean Biogeochemistry Model to show how the organic pumps operate in the two kinds of models. The organic pumps are found to be quite different in two respects. Deep water in the three-box model is relatively well equilibrated with respect to the pCO(2) of the atmosphere while deep water in the GCM tends to be poorly equilibrated. This makes the organic pump inherently stronger in the GCM than in the three-box model. The second difference has to do with the role of polar nutrient utilization. The organic pump in the GCM is shown to have natural upper and lower limits that are set by the initial PO4 concentrations in the deep water formed in the North Atlantic and Southern Ocean. The strength of the organic pump can swing between these limits in response to changes in deep-water formation that alter the mix of northern and southern deep water. Thus, unlike the situation in the three-box model, the organic pump in the GCM can become weaker or stronger without changes in polar nutrient utilization.
引用
收藏
页码:27 / 1
页数:13
相关论文
共 34 条
[1]   What caused the glacial/interglacial atmospheric pCO2 cycles? [J].
Archer, D ;
Winguth, A ;
Lea, D ;
Mahowald, N .
REVIEWS OF GEOPHYSICS, 2000, 38 (02) :159-189
[2]   EFFECT OF DEEP-SEA SEDIMENTARY CALCITE PRESERVATION ON ATMOSPHERIC CO2 CONCENTRATION [J].
ARCHER, D ;
MAIERREIMER, E .
NATURE, 1994, 367 (6460) :260-263
[3]   Atmospheric pCO2 sensitivity to the biological pump in the ocean [J].
Archer, DE ;
Eshel, G ;
Winguth, A ;
Broecker, W ;
Pierrehumbert, R ;
Tobis, M ;
Jacob, R .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 2000, 14 (04) :1219-1230
[4]   The effect of temperature, change of the warm surface waters of the oceans on atmospheric CO2 [J].
Bacastow, RB .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1996, 10 (02) :319-333
[5]   How strong is the Harvardton-Bear constraint? [J].
Broecker, W ;
Lynch-Stieglitz, J ;
Archer, D ;
Hofmann, M ;
Maier-Reimer, E ;
Marchal, O ;
Stocker, T ;
Gruber, N .
GLOBAL BIOGEOCHEMICAL CYCLES, 1999, 13 (04) :817-820
[6]  
Broecker W.S., 1991, Oceanography, V4, P79, DOI [10.5670/oceanog.1991.07, DOI 10.5670/OCEANOG.1991.07]
[7]   GAS-EXCHANGE RATES BETWEEN AIR AND SEA [J].
BROECKER, WS ;
PENG, TH .
TELLUS, 1974, 26 (1-2) :21-35
[8]   GLACIAL TO INTERGLACIAL CHANGES IN OCEAN CHEMISTRY [J].
BROECKER, WS .
PROGRESS IN OCEANOGRAPHY, 1982, 11 (02) :151-197
[9]   The sequence of events surrounding Termination II and their implications for the cause of glacial-interglacial CO2 changes [J].
Broecker, WS ;
Henderson, GM .
PALEOCEANOGRAPHY, 1998, 13 (04) :352-364
[10]  
DOOS K, 1997, INT WOCE NEWSLETT, P3