Auditory event related potentials in major depression: prolonged P300 latency and increased P200 amplitude

被引:98
作者
Vandoolaeghe, E
van Hunsel, F
Nuyten, D
Maes, M [1 ]
机构
[1] AZ Stuivenberg, Clin Res Ctr Mental Hlth, Antwerp, Belgium
[2] AZ Stuivenberg, Dept Neurol, Antwerp, Belgium
[3] Vanderbilt Univ, Dept Psychiat, Nashville, TN USA
关键词
depression; event-related potential; P300; component; antidepressants; fluoxetine; dementia;
D O I
10.1016/S0165-0327(97)00165-1
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Some studies have shown disturbances in auditory event related potentials (AERPs) in patients with major depression. Methods: In this exploratory study, the late AERP components, N100 (latency), P200 (amplitude and latency) and P300 (amplitude and latency) were recorded in 68 subjects, i.e. 39 major depressed subjects, with (n = 4) or without (n = 35) cognitive deterioration, 18 patients with Alzheimer's dementia (SDAT) and 11 normal volunteers. Twenty-five major depressed patients had repeated measurements of AERPs both before and after treatment with antidepressants. Results: Major depressed subjects without cognitive deterioration had significantly higher P300 latency and P200 amplitude than normal volunteers. SDAT patients and major depressed patients with cognitive impairment had a significantly higher P300 latency than depressed patients without cognitive impairment. In the latter, no significant alterations in any of the AERP components upon subchronic treatment with antidepressants were recorded. Nonresponders to antidepressant therapy had significantly higher pretreatment P300 latency and P200 amplitude than responders to treatment (P = 0.006) and normal volunteers (P = 0.0004). Conclusions: The findings may suggest that delayed P300 latency as well as increased P200 amplitude accompany major depression and may predict a nonresponse to subsequent antidepressive therapy. (C) 1998 Elsevier Science B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:105 / 113
页数:9
相关论文
共 47 条
  • [1] ALEXOPOULOS GS, 1993, AM J PSYCHIAT, V150, P1693
  • [2] Allison T, 1986, COGNITIVE PSYCHOPHYS
  • [3] [Anonymous], 1987, DIAGNOSTIC STAT MANU, V4th
  • [4] EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS IN DEPRESSION - INFLUENCE OF TASK, STIMULUS HEMIFIELD AND CLINICAL-FEATURES ON P3 LATENCY
    BRUDER, GE
    TOWEY, JP
    STEWART, JW
    FRIEDMAN, D
    TENKE, C
    QUITKIN, FM
    [J]. BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1991, 30 (03) : 233 - 246
  • [5] EFFECTS OF ORAL SCOPOLAMINE ON HUMAN STIMULUS EVALUATION
    CALLAWAY, E
    HALLIDAY, R
    NAYLOR, H
    SCHECHTER, G
    [J]. PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 1985, 85 (02) : 133 - 138
  • [6] CHARLES G, 1992, Encephale, V18, P225
  • [7] Clark CR, 1996, BIOL PSYCHIAT, V39, P845
  • [8] Coffey C E, 1989, J Neuropsychiatry Clin Neurosci, V1, P135
  • [9] A COEFFICIENT OF AGREEMENT FOR NOMINAL SCALES
    COHEN, J
    [J]. EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1960, 20 (01) : 37 - 46
  • [10] SLOW POTENTIAL SHIFTS AND DECISION P350 INTERACTIONS IN TASKS WITH RANDOM SEQUENCES OF NEAR-THRESHOLD CLICKS AND FINGER STIMULI DELIVERED AT REGULAR INTERVALS
    DESMEDT, JE
    DEBECKER, J
    [J]. ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1979, 47 (06): : 671 - 679