Sexual double standards: A review and methodological critique of two decades of research

被引:522
作者
Crawford, M [1 ]
Popp, D [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Connecticut, Dept Psychol, Storrs, CT 06269 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1080/00224490309552163
中图分类号
B849 [应用心理学];
学科分类号
040203 ;
摘要
A review of 30 studies published since 1980 found evidence for the continued existence of sexual double standards: different standards of sexual permissiveness for women and men. Experimental studies have included predominantly White North American college students; ethnographies, focus group and interview studies, and linguistic analyses have included more diverse samples. Studies show that sexual double standards are influenced by situational and interpersonal factors (e.g., the target's age, level of relationship commitment, and number of partners), and that double standards are local constructions, differing across ethnic and cultural groups. This review discusses methodological issues, including the strengths and limitations of quantitative and qualitative approaches. It also discusses implications for women's high-risk sexual behavior and sexual identity, and suggests directions for future research.
引用
收藏
页码:13 / 26
页数:14
相关论文
共 64 条
[1]  
Adams KL., 1989, Women: A feminist perspective, V4th, P470
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Innovations in feminist psychological research
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1989, Coming of age in New Jersey: college and American culture
[4]  
[Anonymous], GENDER ARTICULATED L
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1967, The social context of premarital sexual permissiveness
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1994, Sexual Cultures and the Construction of Adolescent Identities
[7]  
[Anonymous], HUMOR
[8]  
[Anonymous], 1979, Premarital Sexuality: Attitudes Relationships Behavior
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Gender and adolescent culture
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1995, Going All the Way: Teenage Girls' Tales of Sex, Romance and Pregnancy