ANALYSIS OF DAILY PEAKING AND RUN-OF-RIVER OPERATIONS WITH FLOW VARIABILITY METRICS, CONSIDERING SUBDAILY TO SEASONAL TIME SCALES

被引:23
作者
Haas, Nicholas A. [1 ]
O'Connor, Ben L. [1 ]
Hayse, John W. [1 ]
Bevelhimer, Mark S. [2 ]
Endreny, Theodore A. [3 ]
机构
[1] Argonne Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Argonne, IL 60439 USA
[2] Oak Ridge Natl Lab, Div Environm Sci, Oak Ridge, TN 37831 USA
[3] SUNY Coll Environm Sci & Forestry, Dept Environm Resources Engn, Syracuse, NY 13210 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | 2014年 / 50卷 / 06期
关键词
rivers and streams; flow variability; environmental flows; ecological flow assessment; hydropower operations; environmental impacts; time series analysis; HYDROLOGIC ALTERATION; ENVIRONMENTAL FLOWS; HYDROPEAKING; HYDROPOWER; STREAMFLOW; IMPACT; TROUT; DAMS;
D O I
10.1111/jawr.12228
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
083001 [环境科学];
摘要
Environmental flows are an important consideration in licensing hydropower projects as operational flow releases can result in adverse conditions for downstream ecological communities. Flow variability assessments have typically focused on pre- and post-dam conditions using metrics based on daily averaged flow values. This study used subdaily and daily flow data to assess environmental flow response to changes in hydropower operations from daily peaking to run-of-river. An analysis tool was developed to quantify flow variability metrics and was applied to four hydropower projects. Significant differences were observed between operations at the 99% confidence level in the median flow values using hourly averaged flow datasets. Median daily rise and fall rates decreased on average 34.5 and 27.9%, respectively, whereas median hourly rise and fall rates decreased on average 50.1 and 50.6%, respectively. Differences in operational flow regimes were more pronounced in the hourly averaged flow datasets and less pronounced or nonexistent in the daily averaged flow datasets. These outcomes have implications for the development of ecology-flow relationships that quantify effects of flow on processes such as fish stranding and displacement, along with habitat stability. Results indicate that flow variability statistics should be quantified using subdaily datasets to accurately represent the nature of hydropower operations, especially for daily peaking facilities.
引用
收藏
页码:1622 / 1640
页数:19
相关论文
共 43 条
[1]
[Anonymous], 2012, E HDB STAT METHODS
[2]
[Anonymous], 2012, R LANG ENV STAT COMP
[3]
Arthington AH, 2006, ECOL APPL, V16, P1311, DOI 10.1890/1051-0761(2006)016[1311:TCOPEF]2.0.CO
[4]
2
[5]
A new flashiness index: Characteristics and applications to midwestern rivers and streams [J].
Baker, DB ;
Richards, RP ;
Loftus, TT ;
Kramer, JW .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2004, 40 (02) :503-522
[6]
Bevelhimer M. S., 2006, ORNLTM200689 ENV SCI
[7]
Linking scales of flow variability to lotic ecosystem structure and function [J].
Biggs, BJF ;
Nikora, VI ;
Snelder, TH .
RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2005, 21 (2-3) :283-298
[8]
Geotools: A toolkit for fluvial system analysis [J].
Bledsoe, Brian P. ;
Brown, Michael C. ;
Raff, David A. .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION, 2007, 43 (03) :757-772
[9]
Green hydropower: A new assessment procedure for river management [J].
Bratrich, C ;
Truffer, B ;
Jorde, K ;
Markard, J ;
Meier, W ;
Peter, A ;
Schneider, M ;
Wehrli, B .
RIVER RESEARCH AND APPLICATIONS, 2004, 20 (07) :865-882
[10]
Application of a hierarchical framework for assessing environmental impacts of dam operation: Changes in streamflow, bed mobility and recruitment of riparian trees in a western North American river [J].
Burke, Michael ;
Jorde, Klaus ;
Buffington, John M. .
JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT, 2009, 90 :S224-S236