Influence of surfactants and antibody immobilization strategy on reducing nonspecific protein interactions for molecular recognition force microscopy

被引:55
作者
Brogan, KL [1 ]
Shin, JH [1 ]
Schoenfisch, MH [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ N Carolina, Dept Chem, Chapel Hill, NC 27599 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1021/la048437y
中图分类号
O6 [化学];
学科分类号
0703 ;
摘要
Specific and nonspecific interactions between antibody-modified probes and substrate-immobilized proteins were monitored by atomic force microscopy (AFM). Probes were modified with anti-ovalbumin IgG antibodies immobilized in either an oriented or a random manner. The oriented immobilization of whole IgG was accomplished through the use of Protein A, and random immobilization was carried out with glutaraldehyde. Nonspecific interactions may lead to false detection of antibody-antigen binding events even when the antigen binding sites are properly positioned by an oriented immobilization strategy. Thus, nonionic and zwitterionic surfactants, including Tween 20, Tween 80, Triton X-100, and CHAPS, were evaluated to determine if nonspecific binding events could be reduced without compromising the desired specific antibody-antigen binding. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay and surface plasmon resonance assays were also employed to study antibody-antigen binding as a function of immobilization strategy and surfactant concentration. The data from these studies indicate that Protein A can be used to immobilize whole IgG onto AFM probes for force measurement experiments and that a surfactant is useful for improving the selectivity for such measurements.
引用
收藏
页码:9729 / 9735
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]   Detection of antigen-antibody binding events with the atomic force microscope [J].
Allen, S ;
Chen, XY ;
Davies, J ;
Davies, MC ;
Dawkes, AC ;
Edwards, JC ;
Roberts, CJ ;
Sefton, J ;
Tendler, SJB ;
Williams, PM .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1997, 36 (24) :7457-7463
[2]   The influence of epitope availability on atomic-force microscope studies of antigen-antibody interactions [J].
Allen, S ;
Davies, J ;
Davies, MC ;
Dawkes, AC ;
Roberts, CJ ;
Tendler, SJB ;
Williams, PM .
BIOCHEMICAL JOURNAL, 1999, 341 :173-178
[3]   Direct oriented immobilization of F(ab′) antibody fragments on gold [J].
Brogan, KL ;
Wolfe, KN ;
Jones, PA ;
Schoenfisch, MH .
ANALYTICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2003, 496 (1-2) :73-80
[4]  
Butler J. E., 1996, P205, DOI 10.1016/B978-012214730-2/50010-8
[5]   Biomedical surface science: Foundations to frontiers [J].
Castner, DG ;
Ratner, BD .
SURFACE SCIENCE, 2002, 500 (1-3) :28-60
[6]   Kinetic analysis of the interaction between the monoclonal antibody A33 and its colonic epithelial antigen by the use of an optical biosensor - A comparison of immobilisation strategies [J].
Catimel, B ;
Nerrie, M ;
Lee, FT ;
Scott, AM ;
Ritter, G ;
Welt, S ;
Old, LJ ;
Burgess, AW ;
Nice, EC .
JOURNAL OF CHROMATOGRAPHY A, 1997, 776 (01) :15-30
[7]   Probing recognition process between an antibody and an antigen using atomic force microscopy [J].
Chowdhury, PB ;
Luckham, PF .
COLLOIDS AND SURFACES A-PHYSICOCHEMICAL AND ENGINEERING ASPECTS, 1998, 143 (01) :53-57
[8]   COMPARISON OF EFFECTS OF VARIOUS DETERGENTS ON ANTIGEN-ANTIBODY INTERACTION [J].
CRUMPTON, MJ ;
PARKHOUSE, RM .
FEBS LETTERS, 1972, 22 (02) :210-+
[9]   Specific antigen/antibody interactions measured by force microscopy [J].
Dammer, U ;
Hegner, M ;
Anselmetti, D ;
Wagner, P ;
Dreier, M ;
Huber, W ;
Guntherodt, HJ .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 70 (05) :2437-2441
[10]  
EGODAGE KL, 1998, IMMOBILIZED BIOMOLEC, P35