Comparison of four models predicting the malignancy of pulmonary nodules: A single-center study of Korean adults

被引:30
作者
Yang, Bumhee [1 ]
Jhun, Byung Woo [1 ]
Shin, Sun Hye [1 ]
Jeong, Byeong-Ho [1 ]
Um, Sang-Won [1 ]
Zo, Jae Il [2 ]
Lee, Ho Yun [3 ]
Sohn, Insoek [4 ]
Kim, Hojoong [1 ]
Kwon, O. Jung [1 ]
Lee, Kyungjong [1 ]
机构
[1] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Med,Div Pulm & Crit Care Med, Seoul, South Korea
[2] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Thorac & Cardiovasc Surg, Seoul, South Korea
[3] Sungkyunkwan Univ, Sch Med, Samsung Med Ctr, Dept Radiol, Seoul, South Korea
[4] Samsung Med Ctr, Stat & Data Ctr, Seoul, South Korea
关键词
LUNG-CANCER; PROBABILITY; VALIDATION; RISK; PET; CT;
D O I
10.1371/journal.pone.0201242
中图分类号
O [数理科学和化学]; P [天文学、地球科学]; Q [生物科学]; N [自然科学总论];
学科分类号
070301 [无机化学]; 070403 [天体物理学]; 070507 [自然资源与国土空间规划学]; 090105 [作物生产系统与生态工程];
摘要
Objective Four commonly used clinical models for predicting the probability of malignancy in pulmonary nodules were compared. While three of the models (Mayo Clinic, Veterans Association [VA], and Brock University) are based on clinical and computed tomography (CT) characteristics, one model (Herder) additionally includes the (18) F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake value among the positron emission tomography (PET) characteristics. This study aimed to compare the predictive power of these four models in the context of a population drawn from a single center in an endemic area for tuberculosis in Korea. Methods A retrospective analysis of 242 pathologically confirmed nodules (4-30 mm in diameter) in 242 patients from January 2015 to December 2015 was performed. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) was used to assess the predictive performance with respect to malignancy. Results Of 242 nodules, 187 (77.2%) were malignant and 55 (22.8%) were benign, with tuberculosis granuloma being the most common type of benign nodule (23/55). PET was performed for 227 nodules (93.8%). The Mayo, VA, and Brock models showed similar predictive performance for malignant nodules (AUC: 0.6145, 0.6042 and 0.6820, respectively). The performance of the Herder model (AUC: 0.5567) was not significantly different from that of the Mayo (vs. Herder, p =0.576) or VA models (vs. Herder, p =0.999), and there were no differences among the three models in determining the probability of malignancy of pulmonary nodules. However, compared with the Brock model, the Herder model showed a significantly lower ability to predict malignancy (adjusted p = 0.0132). Conclusions In our study, the Herder model including the 18 FDG uptake value did not perform better than the other models in predicting malignant nodules, suggesting the limited utility of adding PET/CT data to models predicting malignancy in populations within endemic areas for benign inflammatory nodules, such as tuberculosis.
引用
收藏
页数:10
相关论文
共 20 条
[1]
Reduced Lung-Cancer Mortality with Low-Dose Computed Tomographic Screening [J].
Aberle, Denise R. ;
Adams, Amanda M. ;
Berg, Christine D. ;
Black, William C. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Fagerstrom, Richard M. ;
Gareen, Ilana F. ;
Gatsonis, Constantine ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Sicks, JoRean D. .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 2011, 365 (05) :395-409
[2]
Risk of malignancy in pulmonary nodules: A validation study of four prediction models [J].
Al-Ameri, Ali ;
Malhotra, Puneet ;
Thygesen, Helene ;
Plant, Paul K. ;
Vaidyanathan, Sri ;
Karthik, Shishir ;
Scarsbrook, Andrew ;
Callister, Matthew E. J. .
LUNG CANCER, 2015, 89 (01) :27-30
[3]
Benefits and Harms of CT Screening for Lung Cancer A Systematic Review [J].
Bach, Peter B. ;
Mirkin, Joshua N. ;
Oliver, Thomas K. ;
Azzoli, Christopher G. ;
Berry, Donald A. ;
Brawley, Otis W. ;
Byers, Tim ;
Colditz, Graham A. ;
Gould, Michael K. ;
Jett, James R. ;
Sabichi, Anita L. ;
Smith-Bindman, Rebecca ;
Wood, Douglas E. ;
Qaseem, Amir ;
Detterbeck, Frank C. .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2012, 307 (22) :2418-2429
[4]
British Thoracic Society guidelines for the investigation and management of pulmonary nodules [J].
Callister, M. E. J. ;
Baldwin, D. R. ;
Akram, A. R. ;
Barnard, S. ;
Cane, P. ;
Draffan, J. ;
Franks, K. ;
Gleeson, F. ;
Graham, R. ;
Malhotra, P. ;
Prokop, M. ;
Rodger, K. ;
Subesinghe, M. ;
Waller, D. ;
Woolhouse, I. .
THORAX, 2015, 70 :1-54
[5]
Cumulative Incidence of False-Positive Test Results in Lung Cancer Screening A Randomized Trial [J].
Croswell, Jennifer M. ;
Baker, Stuart G. ;
Marcus, Pamela M. ;
Clapp, Jonathan D. ;
Kramer, Barnett S. .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2010, 152 (08) :505-U53
[6]
COMPARING THE AREAS UNDER 2 OR MORE CORRELATED RECEIVER OPERATING CHARACTERISTIC CURVES - A NONPARAMETRIC APPROACH [J].
DELONG, ER ;
DELONG, DM ;
CLARKEPEARSON, DI .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (03) :837-845
[7]
A clinical model to estimate the pretest probability of lung cancer in patients with solitary pulmonary nodules [J].
Gould, Michael K. ;
Ananth, Lakshmi ;
Barnett, Paul G. .
CHEST, 2007, 131 (02) :383-388
[8]
Evaluation of Individuals With Pulmonary Nodules: When Is It Lung Cancer? Diagnosis and Management of Lung Cancer, 3rd ed: American College of Chest Physicians Evidence-Based Clinical Practice Guidelines [J].
Gould, Michael K. ;
Donington, Jessica ;
Lynch, William R. ;
Mazzone, Peter J. ;
Midthun, David E. ;
Naidich, David P. ;
Wiener, Renda Soylemez .
CHEST, 2013, 143 (05) :E93-E120
[9]
Gupta NC, 1996, J NUCL MED, V37, P943
[10]
Clinical prediction model to characterize pulmonary nodules -: Validation and added value of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography [J].
Herder, GJ ;
van Tinteren, H ;
Golding, RP ;
Kostense, PJ ;
Comans, EF ;
Smit, EF ;
Hoekstra, OS .
CHEST, 2005, 128 (04) :2490-2496