Efficacy and tolerability of amlodipine/valsartan combination therapy in hypertensive patients not adequately controlled on amlodipine monotherapy

被引:21
作者
Schunkert, H. [1 ]
Glazer, R. D. [2 ]
Wernsing, M. [2 ]
Yen, J. [2 ]
Macarie, C. E. [5 ]
Vintila, M. M. [3 ]
Romanova, J. [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Klinikum Schleswig Holstein, Med Klin 2, D-23538 Lubeck, Germany
[2] Novartis Pharmaceut, E Hanover, NJ 07936 USA
[3] Spitalul St Pantelimon, Bucharest 012659, Romania
[4] P Stradins Univ Hosp, Dept Cardiol, LV-1002 Riga, Latvia
[5] Inst Boli Cardiovasc, Bucharest 022322, Romania
关键词
Amlodipine; Angiotensin receptor blocker; Blood pressure; Calcium channel blocker; Hypertension; Valsartan; BLOOD-PRESSURE; ADULT PATIENTS; UNITED-STATES; VALSARTAN; PREVALENCE; MANAGEMENT; AWARENESS;
D O I
10.1185/03007990903251193
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objective: This study was designed to explore antihypertensive efficacy and safety of a combination of amlodipine (CCB) and valsartan (ARB), in essential hypertensive patients not adequately controlled by amlodipine monotherapy. Methods: This was a multi-centre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled study in patients with essential hypertension. After a washout period followed by a single-blind amlodipine 10 mg run-in period, patients with mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (msDBP) >= 90 mmHg and <110 mmHg were randomised to receive amlodipine/valsartan (10/160 mg o.d.) or amlodipine (10 mg o.d.) for 8 weeks. Trial registration number: NCT00171002. Main outcome measures: The primary efficacy variable was change from baseline in msDBP at study endpoint. Secondary efficacy variables were change from baseline in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (msSBP), responder rate (msDBP <90 mmHg or >= 10 mmHg reduction from baseline) and DBP control rate (msDBP <90 mmHg). Results: Of the 1283 patients enrolled in single-blind period, 944 were randomised to receive amlodipine/valsartan 10/160 mg (n = 473) and amlodipine 10 mg (n = 471). Statistically significant greater reductions (p < 0.0001) from baseline in msSBP/msDBP were observed with combination therapy (12.9/11.4 mmHg) compared to monotherapy (10.0/9.3 mmHg). Responder rate was significantly greater (p = 0.0011) with combination therapy (79.0%) compared to monotherapy (70.1%). The percentage of patients with controlled DBP was also significantly (p < 0.0001) higher with combination therapy (77.8%) compared to monotherapy (66.5%). Incidence of peripheral oedema was slightly higher with amlodipine monotherapy (9.4%) compared to combination therapy (7.6%). Conclusion: The combination of amlodipine/valsartan in this 8-week double-blind study provided additional BP control and was well tolerated in patients inadequately controlled with amlodipine monotherapy. Results should be interpreted with the knowledge that study entry criteria may limit application to a wider population.
引用
收藏
页码:2655 / 2662
页数:8
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]
Efficacy of the Combination of Amlodipine and Valsartan in Patients With Hypertension Uncontrolled With Previous Monotherapy: The Exforge in Failure After Single Therapy (EX-FAST) Study [J].
Allemann, Yves ;
Fraile, Belen ;
Lambert, Michel ;
Barbier, Michaela ;
Ferber, Philippe ;
Izzo, Joseph L., Jr. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL HYPERTENSION, 2008, 10 (03) :185-194
[2]
Basile Jan, 2004, J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), V6, P621, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2004.03683.x
[3]
Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure [J].
Chobanian, AV ;
Bakris, GL ;
Black, HR ;
Cushman, WC ;
Green, LA ;
Izzo, JL ;
Jones, DW ;
Materson, BJ ;
Oparil, S ;
Wright, JT ;
Roccella, EJ .
HYPERTENSION, 2003, 42 (06) :1206-1252
[4]
Cifkova R, 2003, J Hypertens, V21, P1779
[5]
IMPLICATIONS OF SMALL REDUCTIONS IN DIASTOLIC BLOOD-PRESSURE FOR PRIMARY PREVENTION [J].
COOK, NR ;
COHEN, J ;
HEBERT, PR ;
TAYLOR, JO ;
HENNEKENS, CH .
ARCHIVES OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 1995, 155 (07) :701-709
[6]
Cushman William C, 2002, J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), V4, P393
[7]
Effect of valsartan addition to amlodipine on ankle oedema and subcutaneous tissue pressure in hypertensive patients [J].
Fogari, R. ;
Zoppi, A. ;
Derosa, G. ;
Mugellini, A. ;
Lazzari, P. ;
Rinaldi, A. ;
Fogari, E. ;
Preti, P. .
JOURNAL OF HUMAN HYPERTENSION, 2007, 21 (03) :220-224
[8]
Franklin Stanley S, 2006, J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich), V8, P521, DOI 10.1111/j.1524-6175.2006.05116.x
[9]
Trends in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of hypertension in the United States, 1988-2000 [J].
Hajjar, I ;
Kotchen, TA .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 290 (02) :199-206
[10]
Initial angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor/calcium channel blocker combination therapy achieves superior blood pressure control compared with calcium channel blocker monotherapy in patients with stage 2 hypertension [J].
Jamerson, KA ;
Nwose, O ;
Jean-Louis, L ;
Schofield, L ;
Purkayastha, D ;
Baron, M .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HYPERTENSION, 2004, 17 (06) :495-501