The NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children Version 2.3 (DISC-2.3): Description, acceptability, prevalence rates, and performance in the MECA study

被引:1111
作者
Shaffer, D
Fisher, P
Dulcan, MK
Davies, M
Piacentini, J
SchwabStone, ME
Lahey, BB
Bourdon, K
Jensen, PS
Bird, HR
Canino, G
Regier, DA
机构
[1] COLUMBIA UNIV, DIV CHILD & ADOLOSCENT PSYCHIAT, NEW YORK, NY USA
[2] NORTHWESTERN UNIV, DEPT PSYCHIAT, CHICAGO, IL 60611 USA
[3] YALE UNIV, CTR CHILD STUDY, NEW HAVEN, CT 06520 USA
[4] UNIV CHICAGO, DEPT CHILD PSYCHIAT, CHICAGO, IL 60637 USA
[5] NIMH, DIV EPIDEMIOL & SERV RES, ROCKVILLE, MD 20857 USA
[6] NIMH, DIV CLIN & TREATMENT RES, ROCKVILLE, MD 20857 USA
[7] UNIV PUERTO RICO, SCH MED, BEHAV SCI RES INST, SAN JUAN, PR 00936 USA
关键词
Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children; diagnostic interview; scales; measurement; child psychiatric disorders; epidemiology; prevalence of psychiatric disorders;
D O I
10.1097/00004583-199607000-00012
中图分类号
B844 [发展心理学(人类心理学)];
学科分类号
040202 ;
摘要
Objective: To describe the NIMH Diagnostic Interview Schedule for Children (DISC) Version 2.3 and to provide data on its performance characteristics in the Methods for the Epidemiology of Child and Adolescent Mental Disorders (MECA) Study. Method: Data were collected on the DISC-2.3 at four sites on 1,285 randomly selected children, aged 9 through 17 years, and their parents. Two hundred forty-seven of these child-parent pairs were reassessed on the DISC-2.3 by a clinician interviewer, 1 to 3 weeks later. Results: Administration time was approximately 1 hour and the interview was acceptable to more than 90% of subjects. The reliability of questions to parents assessing impairment and age of onset was generally good to acceptable for most diagnoses but was less satisfactory for the child interview. Using information from parent and child, the prevalence for any diagnosis ranged from 50.6 if no impairment criteria were required to 5.4 if a Global Assessment Scale score of 50 or less was necessary. The prevalence of anxiety disorders and anuresis was markedly reduced by requiring attributable impairment. Conclusions: The DISC-2 is a reliable and economical tool for assessing child psychopathology. Reliability of the DISC-P-2.3 is superior to that of the child DISC for most diagnoses but is least good for anxiety disorders. The 2.3 version of the instrument provides a significant improvement over earlier versions.
引用
收藏
页码:865 / 877
页数:13
相关论文
共 40 条