Factors affecting feeling-of-knowing in a medical intelligent tutoring system: the role of immediate feedback as a metacognitive scaffold

被引:31
作者
El Saadawi, Gilan M. [1 ,2 ]
Azevedo, Roger [3 ]
Castine, Melissa [1 ]
Payne, Velma [1 ]
Medvedeva, Olga [1 ]
Tseytlin, Eugene [1 ]
Legowski, Elizabeth [1 ]
Jukic, Drazen [1 ,4 ,5 ]
Crowley, Rebecca S. [1 ,5 ,6 ]
机构
[1] Univ Pittsburgh, Dept Biomed Informat, Sch Med, UPMC Shadyside Canc Pavil, Pittsburgh, PA 15232 USA
[2] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Nursing, Dept Hlth & Community Serv, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[3] Univ Memphis, Dept Psychol, Memphis, TN 38152 USA
[4] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Dermatol, Pittsburgh, PA 15261 USA
[5] Univ Pittsburgh, Sch Med, Dept Pathol, Pittsburgh, PA USA
[6] Univ Pittsburgh, Intelligent Syst Program, Sch Arts & Sci, Pittsburgh, PA USA
关键词
Intelligent tutoring systems; Diagnostic reasoning; Clinical competence; Cognition; Diagnostic errors; Education medical; Educational technology; Feeling-of-knowing; Pathology; Problem solving; Metacognition; STUDENTS; STRATEGIES; TOOLS;
D O I
10.1007/s10459-009-9162-6
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Previous studies in our laboratory have shown the benefits of immediate feedback on cognitive performance for pathology residents using an intelligent tutoring system (ITS) in pathology. In this study, we examined the effect of immediate feedback on metacognitive performance, and investigated whether other metacognitive scaffolds will support metacognitive gains when immediate feedback is faded. Twenty-three participants were randomized into intervention and control groups. For both groups, periods working with the ITS under varying conditions were alternated with independent computer-based assessments. On day 1, a within-subjects design was used to evaluate the effect of immediate feedback on cognitive and metacognitive performance. On day 2, a between-subjects design was used to compare the use of other metacognitive scaffolds (intervention group) against no metacognitive scaffolds (control group) on cognitive and metacognitive performance, as immediate feedback was faded. Measurements included learning gains (a measure of cognitive performance), as well as several measures of metacognitive performance, including Goodman-Kruskal gamma correlation (G), bias, and discrimination. For the intervention group, we also computed metacognitive measures during tutoring sessions. Results showed that immediate feedback in an intelligent tutoring system had a statistically significant positive effect on learning gains, G and discrimination. Removal of immediate feedback was associated with decreasing metacognitive performance, and this decline was not prevented when students used a version of the tutoring system that provided other metacognitive scaffolds. Results obtained directly from the ITS suggest that other metacognitive scaffolds do have a positive effect on G and discrimination, as immediate feedback is faded. We conclude that immediate feedback had a positive effect on both metacognitive and cognitive gains in a medical tutoring system. Other metacognitive scaffolds were not sufficient to replace immediate feedback in this study. However, results obtained directly from the tutoring system are not consistent with results obtained from assessments. In order to facilitate transfer to real-world tasks, further research will be needed to determine the optimum methods for supporting metacognition as immediate feedback is faded.
引用
收藏
页码:9 / 30
页数:22
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   An effective metacognitive strategy: learning by doing and explaining with a computer-based Cognitive Tutor [J].
Aleven, VAWMM ;
Koedinger, KR .
COGNITIVE SCIENCE, 2002, 26 (02) :147-179
[2]  
Anderson J.R., 1993, Rules of the mind
[3]   Scaffolding self-regulated learning and metacognition - Implications for the design of computer-based scaffolds [J].
Azevedo, R ;
Hadwin, AF .
INSTRUCTIONAL SCIENCE, 2005, 33 (5-6) :367-379
[4]   Does adaptive scaffolding facilitate students' ability to regulate their learning with hypermedia? [J].
Azevedo, R ;
Cromley, JG ;
Seibert, D .
CONTEMPORARY EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGY, 2004, 29 (03) :344-370
[5]  
AZEVEDO R, 2009, HDB METACOG IN PRESS
[6]  
AZEVEDO R, 2008, HDB METACOG IN PRESS
[7]  
Azevedo R., 1998, International Journal of Arti_cial Intelligence in Education, V9, P32
[8]   Why is externally-facilitated regulated learning more effective than self-regulated learning with hypermedia? [J].
Azevedo, Roger ;
Moos, Daniel C. ;
Greene, Jeffrey A. ;
Winters, Fielding I. ;
Crornley, Jennifer G. .
ETR&D-EDUCATIONAL TECHNOLOGY RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT, 2008, 56 (01) :45-72
[9]   EFFECTS OF COGNITIVE FEEDBACK ON PERFORMANCE [J].
BALZER, WK ;
DOHERTY, ME ;
OCONNOR, R .
PSYCHOLOGICAL BULLETIN, 1989, 106 (03) :410-433
[10]  
BUTLER DL, 1995, REV EDUC RES, V65, P245, DOI 10.3102/00346543065003245