Estimating moisture contents in the vadose zone using cross-borehole ground penetrating radar: A study of accuracy and repeatability

被引:80
作者
Alumbaugh, D
Chang, PY
Paprocki, L
Brainard, JR
Glass, RJ
Rautman, CA
机构
[1] New Mexico Inst Min & Technol, Socorro, NM 87801 USA
[2] Univ Wisconsin, Geol Engn Program, Madison, WI 53706 USA
[3] Sandia Natl Labs, Albuquerque, NM 87185 USA
关键词
GPR; vadose zone; moisture content;
D O I
10.1029/2001WR000754
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
[1] Experiments have been conducted to demonstrate the accuracy and precision of moisture content estimates derived from cross-borehole ground penetrating radar (XBGPR) measurements made within the vadose zone. Both numerical simulations and field data demonstrate that although a certain amount of image smearing occurs under ideal conditions the general trends in the spatial variation of the moisture content can be estimated by a simple empirical transformation from images of electromagnetic (EM) wave velocity. The field results are verified by comparing the radar-derived images of volumetric moisture content to neutron log derived values. When an appropriate site-specific conversion from radar wave velocity to moisture content is applied, a root mean square (RMS) error of 2.0-3.1% volumetric moisture content exists between the two sets. Further comparison of the two different data sets along with analysis of plots of the ray density through each cell indicates that regions of high moisture content are better resolved than regions of low moisture and that most of the discrepancy between radar-derived and neutron-derived moisture contents occurs in regions of high moisture content. Better spatial resolution can be provided if dense station spacing is used. However, the amount of extra time required to acquire the extra data may limit the usefulness of the method. Repeatability measurements made with five data sets demonstrate that the precision error of the data acquisition system employed averages about 0.54 ns, which translates to about a 0.5% error in moisture content estimation.
引用
收藏
页码:45 / 1
页数:12
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]  
ALDRIDGE DF, 1993, J SEISM EXPLOR, V2, P257
[2]   High-resolution characterization of vadose zone dynamics using cross-borehole radar [J].
Binley, A ;
Winship, P ;
Middleton, R ;
Pokar, M ;
West, J .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2001, 37 (11) :2639-2652
[3]  
BRAINARD JR, 2002, SAND022168 SAND NAT
[4]   CROSSHOLE SEISMIC TOMOGRAPHY [J].
BREGMAN, ND ;
BAILEY, RC ;
CHAPMAN, CH .
GEOPHYSICS, 1989, 54 (02) :200-215
[5]   Determining water content and saturation from dielectric measurements in layered materials [J].
Chan, CY ;
Knight, RJ .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1999, 35 (01) :85-93
[6]   IMPROVED CALIBRATION OF TIME-DOMAIN REFLECTOMETRY SOIL-WATER CONTENT MEASUREMENTS [J].
DIRKSEN, C ;
DASBERG, S .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1993, 57 (03) :660-667
[7]   Efficient three-dimensional data inversion: Soil characterization and moisture monitoring from cross-well ground-penetrating radar at a Vermont test site [J].
Eppstein, MJ ;
Dougherty, DE .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1998, 34 (08) :1889-1900
[8]   Velocity variations and water content estimated from multi-offset, ground-penetrating radar [J].
Greaves, RJ ;
Lesmes, DP ;
Lee, JM ;
Toksoz, MN .
GEOPHYSICS, 1996, 61 (03) :683-695
[9]  
HAWLEY HW, 1983, 34 FIELD C SOC REG 2, P334
[10]  
Hubbard S.S., 1997, The leading Edge, V16, P1623, DOI DOI 10.1190/1.1437539