The net cost of Alzheimer disease and related dementia: A population-based study of Georgia Medicaid recipients

被引:47
作者
Martin, BC [1 ]
Ricci, JF
Kotzan, JA
Lang, K
Menzin, J
机构
[1] Univ Georgia, Dept Clin & Adm Sci, Coll Pharm, Athens, GA 30602 USA
[2] Boston Hlth Econ Inc, Billerica, MA USA
关键词
Alzheimer disease; cost of illness; dementia; economics;
D O I
10.1097/00002093-200007000-00006
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
The objective of this study was to estimate the direct medical cost of Alzheimer disease (AD) and related dementia to the Georgia Medicaid program. A retrospective, cross-sectional, matched control group design was used. AD cases 50 years of age and older were identified by using International Classification of Diseases (9th edition, Clinical Modification) diagnosis codes from 1994 Georgia Medicaid administrative claims files. Fur every case, three age- and gender-matched non-AD controls were selected. Differences in average recipient Medicaid expenditures between cases and controls were estimated using weighted least squares regression analysis, adjusting for age, Sender, race, Charlson comorbidity index, Medicare eligibility, and months of Medicaid eligibility. A total of 8,671 AD cases were identified (prevalence, 4.4%). The average adjusted annual Medicaid expenditure per AD recipient was $14,492 (U.S.), The net (i.e., excess) average annual Medicaid cost per AD recipient (i.e., the difference in adjusted mean expenditures between cases and controls) was estimated to bt approximately $8,200. Excessive nursing home expenditures accounted for most of the additional cost of treating dementia (> 85%), although inpatient hospital, physician, outpatient, and prescription drug expenditures also were higher among patients with AD. Based on these estimates, Georgia Medicaid is projected to spend almost $70 million annually for AD and related dementia. The excessive cost attributable to AD poses a significant burden to the Georgia Medicaid program.
引用
收藏
页码:151 / 159
页数:9
相关论文
共 24 条
[1]  
AMADUCCI L, 1997, ADV ALZ DIS, P3
[2]   A NEW METHOD OF CLASSIFYING PROGNOSTIC CO-MORBIDITY IN LONGITUDINAL-STUDIES - DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION [J].
CHARLSON, ME ;
POMPEI, P ;
ALES, KL ;
MACKENZIE, CR .
JOURNAL OF CHRONIC DISEASES, 1987, 40 (05) :373-383
[3]  
CUMMINGS J, 1996, CLIN DIAGNOSIS MANAG, P3
[4]   ADAPTING A CLINICAL COMORBIDITY INDEX FOR USE WITH ICD-9-CM ADMINISTRATIVE DATABASES [J].
DEYO, RA ;
CHERKIN, DC ;
CIOL, MA .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1992, 45 (06) :613-619
[5]  
Duan N., 1983, J EC BUSINESS STATIS, V1, P115, DOI [DOI 10.2307/1391852, DOI 10.1080/07350015.1983.10509330]
[6]   The effect of different diagnostic criteria on the prevalence of dementia [J].
Erkinjuntti, T ;
Ostbye, T ;
Steenhuis, R ;
Hachinski, V .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1997, 337 (23) :1667-1674
[7]  
Ernst RL, 1997, ALZ DIS ASSOC DIS, V11, P135
[8]   THE US ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COSTS OF ALZHEIMERS-DISEASE REVISITED [J].
ERNST, RL ;
HAY, JW .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH, 1994, 84 (08) :1261-1264
[9]  
HARDENS M, 1997, ALZHEIMERS DIS MOL B, P19
[10]  
Hendrie HC, 1997, GERIATRICS-US, V52, pS4