Prospective multicenter study of antibiotic prophylaxis in operative treatment of appendicitis

被引:15
作者
Koch, A
Zippel, R
Marusch, F
Schmidt, U
Gastinger, I
Lippert, H
机构
[1] Carl Thiem Kinikum, Dept Surg, D-03048 Cottbus, Germany
[2] Univ Magdeburg, Dept Surg, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
[3] Univ Magdeburg, Inst Biometry & Med Informat Technol, D-39106 Magdeburg, Germany
关键词
appendicitis; prospective multicenter study; antibiotic prophylaxis; complications;
D O I
10.1159/000018881
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background/Aims: A prospective, multicenter observation study was conducted to investigate the effectiveness of antibiotic prophylaxis in the operative treatment of appendicitis. Methods: Between June 1996 and May 1997, a total of 4,968 patients underwent an operation for appendicitis at 34 East German hospitals. 41.4% (n = 2,424) received perioperative antibiotic prophylaxis whereas in 58.9% of the cases this was not given. The patients who received antibiotic prophylaxis constituted a negative selection, both with regard to risk factors and to the stage of inflammation. Results: In the total test group, the rate for septic disorders of wound healing amounted to 2.5% (n = 120). The use of antibiotic prophylaxis makes it possible to significant lower the incidence of postoperative septic disorders of wound healing (p < 0.001), In both conventional (0.7% with prophylaxis vs. 3.8% without) and in laparoscopic appendectomy (0 vs. 1.0%) the rate for septic disorders of wound healing can be reduced (p < 0.001). The global comparison irrespective of possible antibiotic prophylaxis shows a significant advantage for appendectomies which started with laparoscopy (p = 0.008), but in the subgroups with prophylaxis this advantage is completely neutralized (p = 0.78). Conclusion: From this one can deduce that conventional appendectomy with antibiotic prophylaxis comprises no higher risk of wound infection than laparoscopy, since the risk of conversion exists for every operation begun by laparoscopy. These results would lead to the conclusion that antibiotic prophylaxis should be given before every appendectomy, whether by laparoscopy or conventional methods. Copyright (C) 2000 S. Karger AG, Basel.
引用
收藏
页码:370 / 378
页数:9
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   ANTIBIOTIC-PROPHYLAXIS IN ACUTE NONPERFORATED APPENDICITIS - THE DANISH-MULTICENTER-STUDY-GROUP-111 [J].
BAUER, T ;
VENNITS, B ;
HOLM, B ;
HAHNPEDERSEN, J ;
LYSEN, D ;
GALATIUS, H ;
KRISTENSEN, ES ;
GRAVERSEN, P ;
WILHELMSEN, F ;
SKJOLDBORG, H ;
MALMFRED, S ;
VILLADSEN, J ;
BENDIX, J .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1989, 209 (03) :307-311
[2]  
BERGAN T, 1984, SCAND J GASTROENTERO, V19, P1
[3]  
BIESER U, 1997, 5 ANN COCHR C AMST O
[4]  
BURKE JF, 1961, SURGERY, V50, P161
[5]   THE TIMING OF PROPHYLACTIC ADMINISTRATION OF ANTIBIOTICS AND THE RISK OF SURGICAL-WOUND INFECTION [J].
CLASSEN, DC ;
EVANS, RS ;
PESTOTNIK, SL ;
HORN, SD ;
MENLOVE, RL ;
BURKE, JP .
NEW ENGLAND JOURNAL OF MEDICINE, 1992, 326 (05) :281-286
[6]  
ELDHOHAYAN A, 1993, EUR SURG RES, V25, P60
[7]   CEFTRIAXONE VERSUS CLAVULANATE-POTENTIATED AMOXYCILLIN FOR PROPHYLAXIS AGAINST POSTOPERATIVE SEPSIS IN BILIARY SURGERY - A PROSPECTIVE RANDOMIZED STUDY IN 200 PATIENTS [J].
ELMUFTI, M ;
RAKAS, FS ;
GLESSA, A ;
ABDULHADI, A ;
EKGAM, S ;
FRAITIS, F ;
ZAIDI, J .
CURRENT MEDICAL RESEARCH AND OPINION, 1989, 11 (06) :354-359
[8]  
GASTINGER I, 1991, ZBL CHIR, V116, P267
[9]  
GASTINGER I, 1995, COLOPROCTOLOGY, V17, P18
[10]  
GASTINGER I, 1996, MIN INVAS CHIR, V5, P143