Combining field data and computer simulations for calibration and prediction

被引:459
作者
Higdon, D
Kennedy, M
Cavendish, JC
Cafeo, JA
Ryne, RD
机构
[1] Los Alamos Natl Lab, Stat Sci Grp, Los Alamos, NM 87545 USA
[2] Univ Sheffield, Dept Probabil & Stat, Sheffield, S Yorkshire, England
[3] Gen Motors R&D Ctr, Mfg Syst Res Lab, Warren, MI 48090 USA
[4] Gen Motors R&D Ctr, Vehicle Dev Res Lab, Warren, MI 48090 USA
[5] Univ Calif Berkeley, Lawrence Berkeley Lab, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
关键词
calibration; computer experiments; predictability; uncertainty quantification; Gaussian process; model validation; simulator science;
D O I
10.1137/S1064827503426693
中图分类号
O29 [应用数学];
学科分类号
070104 ;
摘要
We develop a statistical approach for characterizing uncertainty in predictions that are made with the aid of a computer simulation model. Typically, the computer simulation code models a physical system and requires a set of inputs - some known and specified, others unknown. A limited amount of field data from the true physical system is available to inform us about the unknown inputs and also to inform us about the uncertainty that is associated with a simulation-based prediction. The approach given here allows for the following: uncertainty regarding model inputs (i.e., calibration); accounting for uncertainty due to limitations on the number of simulations that can be carried out; discrepancy between the simulation code and the actual physical system; uncertainty in the observation process that yields the actual field data on the true physical system. The resulting analysis yields predictions and their associated uncertainties while accounting for multiple sources of uncertainty. We use a Bayesian formulation and rely on Gaussian process models to model unknown functions of the model inputs. The estimation is carried out using a Markov chain Monte Carlo method. This methodology is applied to two examples: a charged particle accelerator and a spot welding process.
引用
收藏
页码:448 / 466
页数:19
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2012, Methods of multivariate analysis
[2]  
BAYARRI M, 2002, P WORKSH FDN V V 21
[3]   P values for composite null models [J].
Bayarri, MJ ;
Berger, JO .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2000, 95 (452) :1127-1142
[4]   BAYESIAN COMPUTATION AND STOCHASTIC-SYSTEMS [J].
BESAG, J ;
GREEN, P ;
HIGDON, D ;
MENGERSEN, K .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 10 (01) :3-41
[5]   Bayesian forecasting for complex systems using computer simulators [J].
Craig, PS ;
Goldstein, M ;
Rougier, JC ;
Seheult, AH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 96 (454) :717-729
[6]   BAYESIAN PREDICTION OF DETERMINISTIC FUNCTIONS, WITH APPLICATIONS TO THE DESIGN AND ANALYSIS OF COMPUTER EXPERIMENTS [J].
CURRIN, C ;
MITCHELL, T ;
MORRIS, M ;
YLVISAKER, D .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 1991, 86 (416) :953-963
[7]   LIE ALGEBRAIC TREATMENT OF LINEAR AND NONLINEAR BEAM DYNAMICS [J].
DRAGT, AJ ;
NERI, F ;
RANGARAJAN, G ;
DOUGLAS, DR ;
HEALY, LM ;
RYNE, RD .
ANNUAL REVIEW OF NUCLEAR AND PARTICLE SCIENCE, 1988, 38 :455-496
[8]   Methods for approximating integrals in statistics with special emphasis on Bayesian integration problems [J].
Evans, M ;
Swartz, T .
STATISTICAL SCIENCE, 1995, 10 (03) :254-272
[9]  
Gilks WR, 1998, MARKOV CHAIN MONTE C
[10]   Uncertainty in production forecasts based on well observations, seismic data, and production history [J].
Hegstad, BK ;
Omre, H .
SPE JOURNAL, 2001, 6 (04) :409-424