Comparison of ER-2 aircraft and POAM III, MLS, and SAGE II satellite measurements during SOLVE using traditional correlative analysis and trajectory hunting technique

被引:10
作者
Danilin, MY
Ko, MKW
Bevilacqua, RM
Lyjak, LV
Froidevaux, L
Santee, ML
Zawodny, JM
Hoppel, KW
Richard, EC
Spackman, JR
Weinstock, EM
Herman, RL
McKinney, KA
Wennberg, PO
Eisele, FL
Stimpfle, RM
Scott, CJ
Elkins, JW
Bui, TV
机构
[1] Atmospher & Environm Res Inc, Lexington, MA 02421 USA
[2] USN, Res Lab, Washington, DC 20375 USA
[3] Natl Ctr Atmospher Res, ACD, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
[4] NASA, Jet Prop Lab, Pasadena, CA 91109 USA
[5] NASA, Langley Res Ctr, Hampton, VA 23681 USA
[6] NOAA, Aeron Lab, Boulder, CO 80303 USA
[7] Harvard Univ, Dept Earth & Planetary Sci, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
[8] CALTECH, Div Geol & Planetary Sci, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[9] Georgia Inst Technol, Atlanta, GA 30332 USA
[10] NASA, Ames Res Ctr, Moffett Field, CA 94035 USA
[11] Harvard Univ, Dept Chem & Biol Chem, Cambridge, MA 02138 USA
关键词
measurement comparison; trajectory hunting; correactive analysis; SOLVE;
D O I
10.1029/2001JD000781
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
[1] We compared the version 5 Microwave Limb Sounder (MLS), version 3 Polar Ozone and Aerosol Measurement III (POAM III), version 6.0 Stratospheric Aerosol and Gas Experiment II (SAGE II), and NASA ER-2 aircraft measurements made in the Northern Hemisphere in January-February 2000 during the SAGE III Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). This study addresses one of the key scientific objectives of the SOLVE campaign, namely, to validate multiplatform satellite measurements made in the polar stratosphere during winter. This intercomparison was performed by using a traditional correlative analysis (TCA) and a trajectory hunting technique (THT). TCA compares profiles colocated within a chosen spatial-temporal vicinity. Launching backward and forward trajectories from the points of measurement, the THT identifies air parcels sampled at least twice within a prescribed match criterion during the course of 5 days. We found that the ozone measurements made by these four instruments agree most of the time within +/-10% in the stratosphere up to 1400 K (similar to35 km). The water vapor measurements from POAM III and the ER-2 Harvard Lyman alpha hygrometer and Jet Propulsion Laboratory laser hygrometer agree to within +/-0.5 ppmv (or about +/-10%) in the lower stratosphere above 380 K. The MLS and ER-2 ClO measurements agree within their error bars for the TCA. The MLS and ER-2 nitric acid measurements near 17- to 20-km altitude agree within their uncertainties most of the time with a hint of a positive offset by MLS according to the TCA. We also applied the Atmospheric and Environmental Research, Inc. box model constrained by the ER-2 measurements for analysis of the ClO and HNO3 measurements using the THT. We found that: (1) the model values of ClO are smaller by about 0.3-0.4 (0.2) ppbv below (above) 400 K than those by MLS and (2) the HNO3 comparison shows a positive offset of MLS values by similar to1 and 1-2 ppbv below 400 K and near 450 K, respectively. Our study shows that, with some limitations (like HNO3 comparison under polar stratospheric cloud conditions), the THT is a more powerful tool for validation studies than the TCA, making conclusions of the comparison statistically more robust.
引用
收藏
页数:19
相关论文
共 69 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]   Intercomparison of satellite and aircraft observations of ozone, CFC-11, and NOy using trajectory mapping [J].
Bacmeister, JT ;
Kuell, V ;
Offermann, D ;
Riese, M ;
Elkins, JW .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D13) :16379-16390
[3]   THE UPPER-ATMOSPHERE RESEARCH SATELLITE MICROWAVE LIMB SOUNDER INSTRUMENT [J].
BARATH, FT ;
CHAVEZ, MC ;
COFIELD, RE ;
FLOWER, DA ;
FRERKING, MA ;
GRAM, MB ;
HARRIS, WM ;
HOLDEN, JR ;
JARNOT, RF ;
KLOEZEMAN, WG ;
KLOSE, GJ ;
LAU, GKK ;
LOO, MS ;
MADDISON, BJ ;
MATTAUCH, RJ ;
MCKINNEY, RP ;
PECKHAM, GE ;
PICKETT, HM ;
SIEBES, G ;
SOLTIS, FS ;
SUTTIE, RA ;
TARSALA, JA ;
WATERS, JW ;
WILSON, WJ .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1993, 98 (D6) :10751-10762
[4]   Refractive, indices of aerosols in the upper troposphere and lower stratosphere [J].
Baumgardner, D ;
Dye, JE ;
Gandrud, B ;
Barr, K ;
Kelly, K ;
Chan, KR .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1996, 23 (07) :749-752
[5]   Introduction to special section: Polar ozone and aerosol measurement (POAM II) [J].
Bevilacqua, RM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1997, 102 (D19) :23591-23592
[6]   STRATOSPHERIC AEROSOL GROWTH AND HNO3 GAS-PHASE DEPLETION FROM COUPLED HNO3 AND WATER-UPTAKE BY LIQUID PARTICLES [J].
CARSLAW, KS ;
LUO, BP ;
CLEGG, SL ;
PETER, T ;
BRIMBLECOMBE, P ;
CRUTZEN, PJ .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 1994, 21 (23) :2479-2482
[7]   Analysis of UARS data in the southern polar vortex in September 1992 using a chemical transport model [J].
Chipperfield, MP ;
Santee, ML ;
Froidevaux, L ;
Manney, GL ;
Read, WG ;
Waters, JW ;
Roche, AE ;
Russell, JM .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1996, 101 (D13) :18861-18881
[8]   SAGE-II INVERSION ALGORITHM [J].
CHU, WP ;
MCCORMICK, MP ;
LENOBLE, J ;
BROGNIEZ, C ;
PRUVOST, P .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1989, 94 (D6) :8339-8351
[9]   Quantitative constraints on the atmospheric chemistry of nitrogen oxides: An analysis along chemical coordinates [J].
Cohen, RC ;
Perkins, KK ;
Koch, LC ;
Stimpfle, RM ;
Wennberg, PO ;
Hanisco, TF ;
Lanzendorf, EJ ;
Bonne, GP ;
Voss, PB ;
Salawitch, RJ ;
Del Negro, LA ;
Wilson, JC ;
McElroy, CT ;
Bui, TP .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2000, 105 (D19) :24283-24304
[10]   A Monte Carlo uncertainty analysis of ozone trend predictions in a two-dimensional model [J].
Considine, DB ;
Stolarski, RS ;
Hollandsworth, SM ;
Jackman, CH ;
Fleming, EL .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D1) :1749-1765