A systematic approach to quality function deployment with a full illustrative example

被引:244
作者
Chan, LK [1 ]
Wu, ML [1 ]
机构
[1] City Univ Hong Kong, Dept Management Sci, Kowloon, Hong Kong, Peoples R China
来源
OMEGA-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF MANAGEMENT SCIENCE | 2005年 / 33卷 / 02期
关键词
quality function deployment; house of quality; measurement scale; symmetrical triangular fuzzy number; entropy;
D O I
10.1016/j.omega.2004.03.010
中图分类号
C93 [管理学];
学科分类号
12 ; 1201 ; 1202 ; 120202 ;
摘要
This paper presents a systematic and operational approach to quality function deployment (QFD), a customer-driven quality management system for product development. After a comprehensive description of the relevant elements in house of quality (HOQ), the first and most influential phase of the QFD system, a 9-step model is proposed to help build such an HOQ. A number of 9-point scales are developed whose uses could help unify the various measurements in HOQ to avoid arbitrariness. Special attention is paid to the various subjective assessments in the HOQ process, and symmetrical triangular fuzzy numbers (STFNs) are suggested for use to capture the vagueness in people's linguistic assessments. Instead of using the quite subjective sales-point concept, entropy method is introduced to conduct competitive analysis and derive competitive priority ratings. A thorough explanation is given to address the concepts, computations and implementations in the proposed HOQ model, followed by a full example for a fried Chinese vegetable to illustrate step by step all the relevant details with the purpose of facilitating the understanding and application of the QFD process. Two difficult parts omitted from our model, especially the correlation matrices, are discussed in some detail finally, and possible approaches are also suggested to deal with them in a potentially more complete HOQ model. (C) 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:119 / 139
页数:21
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]   IDENTIFICATION OF DETERMINANT ATTRIBUTES - COMPARISON OF METHODS [J].
ALPERT, MI .
JOURNAL OF MARKETING RESEARCH, 1971, 8 (02) :184-191
[2]  
American Supplier Institute, 1994, QUAL FUNCT DEPL SERV
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1991, QUALITY FUNCTION DEP
[4]  
[Anonymous], 1987, FUZZY SET DECISION M
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1992, LECT NOTES ECON M, DOI DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-46768-4_5
[6]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Qual. Eng., DOI [DOI 10.1080/08982119808919160, 10.1080/08982119808919160]
[7]  
BALTHAZARD PA, 1995, INT J QUALITY RELIAB, V12, P43
[8]   The house of quality in a design process [J].
Belhe, U ;
Kusiak, A .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PRODUCTION RESEARCH, 1996, 34 (08) :2119-2131
[9]   A REVIEW OF SOME METHODS FOR RANKING FUZZY SUBSETS [J].
BORTOLAN, G ;
DEGANI, R .
FUZZY SETS AND SYSTEMS, 1985, 15 (01) :1-19
[10]   Quality function deployment: A literature review [J].
Chan, LK ;
Wu, ML .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF OPERATIONAL RESEARCH, 2002, 143 (03) :463-497