Antimicrobial resistance among clinical isolates from the Chinese Meropenem Surveillance Study (CMSS), 2003-2008

被引:35
作者
Wang, Hui [1 ]
Chen, Minjun [1 ]
Ni, Yuxing [2 ]
Liu, Yudong [1 ]
Sun, Hongli [1 ]
Yu, Yunsong [3 ]
Yu, Xiujuan [4 ]
Mei, Yaning [5 ]
Liu, Min [6 ]
Sun, Ziyong [7 ]
Chu, Yunzhuo [8 ]
Hu, Zhidong [9 ]
Huang, Xinhong [10 ]
机构
[1] Chinese Acad Med Sci, Peking Union Med Coll Hosp, Dept Clin Lab, Beijing 100370, Peoples R China
[2] Shanghai Jiao Tong Univ, Ruijin Hosp, Sch Med, Shanghai 200025, Peoples R China
[3] Zhejiang Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Coll Med, Hangzhou 310003, Zhejiang, Peoples R China
[4] Shandong Univ, Qi Lu Hosp, Jinan 250012, Peoples R China
[5] Nanjing Med Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Nanjing 210029, Peoples R China
[6] Sun Yat Sen Univ, Affiliated Hosp 1, Guangzhou 510060, Guangdong, Peoples R China
[7] Huazhong Univ Sci & Technol, Tongji Med Coll, Tongji Hosp, Wuhan 430030, Peoples R China
[8] China Med Univ, Hosp 1, Shenyang 110001, Peoples R China
[9] Tianjin Med Univ, Gen Hosp, Tianjin 300052, Peoples R China
[10] Fujian Med Univ, Union Hosp, Fuzhou 350001, Peoples R China
基金
中国国家自然科学基金;
关键词
Antibiotic surveillance; Gram-negative bacilli; Resistance; Meropenem; GRAM-NEGATIVE BACTERIA; CARE-UNIT PATIENTS; ACINETOBACTER-BAUMANNII; MYSTIC PROGRAM; ENTEROBACTERIACEAE; PSEUDOMONAS; HOSPITALS; THREAT;
D O I
10.1016/j.ijantimicag.2009.11.010
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
The Chinese Meropenem Surveillance Study (CMSS) programme was initiated in 2003 with the aim of monitoring the antimicrobial activity of broad-spectrum agents against nosocomial Gram-negative bacilli in China. From 2003 to 2008, a total of 3892 isolates were collected from 10 teaching hospitals. The minimum inhibitory concentrations (MICs) of 11 antimicrobial agents were determined by the agar dilution method. During the study period, a marked decrease in the susceptibility of Acinetobacter spp. to meropenem and imipenem was noticed, from 94.6% to 60.7% and from 92.5% to 62.1%, respectively. However, for Pseudomonas aeruginosa the susceptibility was relatively stable, with susceptibility rates of 86.2% to 76.0% for meropenem and 74.8% to 70.5% for imipenem. Meropenem and imipenem exhibited the highest activities against enterobacterial organisms, with ranges of MIC90 values (MIC for 90% of the organisms) from 0.064 mg/L to 0.25 mg/L and 0.25 to 4 mg/L, respectively. Except for Acinetobacter spp., the next most active agent against the majority of isolates was amikacin, with susceptibility ranging from 78.8% to 93.3%, followed by piperacillin/tazobactam (73.7% to 98.2%), cefoperazone/sulbactam (63.9% to 99.1%), cefepime (67.0% to 95.4%) and ceftazidime (54.5% to 93.3%). The percentage of isolates positive for extended-spectrum beta-lactamases among Escherichia coli, Klebsiella spp. and Proteus mirabilis ranged from 50.9% to 66.7%, 25.4% to 42.4% and 8.9% to 24.2%, respectively. These CMSS results have demonstrated increasing resistance of Acinetobacter spp. to carbapenems, resulting from the spread of highly resistant clones. Continued surveillance studies, including CMSS, as well as potent measures for controlling the spread of resistant clones are required. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. and the International Society of Chemotherapy. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:227 / 234
页数:8
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2003, NCCLS Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria That Grow Aerobically
[2]  
Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute, 2008, M100S18 CLSI
[3]   The need for antimicrobial resistance surveillance [J].
Felmingham, D .
JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL CHEMOTHERAPY, 2002, 50 :1-7
[4]   An overview of the Meropenem Yearly Susceptibility Test Information Collection (MYSTIC) Program: 1997-2004 [J].
Jones, RN ;
Mendes, C ;
Turner, PJ ;
Masterton, R .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2005, 53 (04) :247-256
[5]   Comparative activity of meropenem in US medical centers (2007): initiating the 2nd decade of MYSTIC program surveillance [J].
Jones, Ronald N. ;
Kirby, Jeffrey T. ;
Rhomberg, Paul R. .
DIAGNOSTIC MICROBIOLOGY AND INFECTIOUS DISEASE, 2008, 61 (02) :203-213
[6]   The β-lactamase threat in Enterobacteriaceae, Pseudomonas and Acinetobacter [J].
Livermore, David M. ;
Woodford, Neil .
TRENDS IN MICROBIOLOGY, 2006, 14 (09) :413-420
[7]   Multiple mechanisms of antimicrobial resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa:: Our worst nightmare? [J].
Livermore, DM .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 34 (05) :634-640
[8]   Antimicrobial resistance among gram-negative bacilli causing infections in intensive care unit patients in the united states between 1993 and 2004 [J].
Lockhart, Shawn R. ;
Abramson, Murray A. ;
Beekmann, Susan E. ;
Gallagher, Gale ;
Riedel, Stefan ;
Diekema, Daniel J. ;
Quinn, John P. ;
Doern, Gary V. .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2007, 45 (10) :3352-3359
[9]   Antimicrobial susceptibility of tigecycline and comparators against bacterial isolates collected as part of the TEST study in Europe (2004-2007) [J].
Norskov-Lauritsen, Niels ;
Marchandin, Helene ;
Dowzicky, Michael J. .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ANTIMICROBIAL AGENTS, 2009, 34 (02) :121-130
[10]   Resistance in gram-negative bacteria: Enterobacteriaceae [J].
Paterson, David L. .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF INFECTION CONTROL, 2006, 34 (05) :S20-S28